2016
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of occupational physical activities on vertebral dimensions in midlife in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966

Abstract: OPA seems to have very little effect on vertebral size. Our results suggest that the effect of LTPA on vertebral size is different to that of OPA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The axial CSA of L4 (mm 2 ) was calculated using the previously validated (2,15) ellipsoid formula CSA = π x a/2 x b/2, in which a = vertebral width (mean of measured widths) and b = vertebral depth (mean of measured depths). We chose to investigate this parameter because 1) it substantially affects the weightbearing capacity of the vertebra (5,16), 2) it is independently associated with vertebral fracture risk (1,3,17), and 3) it has been previously used in similar studies (8,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Vertebral Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The axial CSA of L4 (mm 2 ) was calculated using the previously validated (2,15) ellipsoid formula CSA = π x a/2 x b/2, in which a = vertebral width (mean of measured widths) and b = vertebral depth (mean of measured depths). We chose to investigate this parameter because 1) it substantially affects the weightbearing capacity of the vertebra (5,16), 2) it is independently associated with vertebral fracture risk (1,3,17), and 3) it has been previously used in similar studies (8,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Vertebral Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose L4 because 1) its caudal location in the spine exposes it to significant biomechanical loads (24), 2) it is more stable than L5 (24), 3) it seems to represent the other lumbar vertebrae well (21,25), and 4) it has been previously used in similar studies (8,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)26).…”
Section: Vertebral Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured L4 as it was located in the centre of the MRI scans and was therefore most often accessible with appropriate axial and sagittal slices. L4 is known to represent the other lumbar vertebrae well [28,29] and has been used in a number of previous studies [28,[30][31][32][33]. We have previously used cadaveric vertebrae to compare MRI-based vertebral measurements to direct measurements taken with standard osteometric calipers and concluded that they are highly equivalent (correlation coefficient = 0.985) [15].…”
Section: Vertebral Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we report the sex estimation potential of three easily obtainable dimensions of the L4 body (width, depth, height) in three age groups (20,30,46 years) of the general living Northern Finnish population. We obtained the L4 dimensions from recent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and used univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to assess them in terms of sex estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSA was chosen because of its direct association with vertebral weight‐bearing capacity and fracture risk . The CSA of L 4 has also been a common outcome in similar studies . We have previously shown that vertebral dimensions can be accurately measured using MRI .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%