1995
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199502000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Okt3 in Steroid-Resistant Renal Transplant Rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, a first rejection episode can be adequately treated with high-dose corticosteroids. However, in approximately 30% of the patients, the rejection episode cannot be reversed with corticosteroid therapy alone (2,8,10). In these cases of steroid resistance, the patient requires more rigorous therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, a first rejection episode can be adequately treated with high-dose corticosteroids. However, in approximately 30% of the patients, the rejection episode cannot be reversed with corticosteroid therapy alone (2,8,10). In these cases of steroid resistance, the patient requires more rigorous therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demon strated the greater effectiveness of this preparation in reversing acute rejection episodes when compared with corticosteroid therapy [7,10,13]. The Ortho Multicenter Transplant Study Group trial [13] showed that OKT3 reversed 94% of all acute renal allograft rejection epi sodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A powerful immuosuppressive agent, however, can be expected to have side effects and the use of OKT3 has been associated with infective complications [7,18], and other problems such as the cytokine release syndrome, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and the development of antibodies to OKT3. The latter may preclude its further use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of potent antibodies in renal transplant recipients has been linked with an increased mortality [3], and higher cyclosporine doses resulted in an increased rate of malignancies when compared with lower cyclosporine doses [16]. Furthermore, it is well established that infection rates increase with more aggressive immunosuppressive regimens [3,14,15,[17][18][19][20].The decision to choose a therapeutic or prophylactic regimen not only depends on the probabilities of the clinical outcome, but also on the patient's preference regarding this outcome. The patient's preferences for health outcomes can be explicitly assessed and expressed in quantitative terms known as utilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combinations of novel and traditional immunosuppressive drugs have certainly improved graft survival, but the advantages of a more efficacious immunosuppression with respect to transplant survival are troubled by an increased rate of opportunistic infections and/or malignancies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The use of potent antibodies in renal transplant recipients has been linked with an increased mortality [3], and higher cyclosporine doses resulted in an increased rate of malignancies when compared with lower cyclosporine doses [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%