2007
DOI: 10.3161/068.042.0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Old Nest Material on Nest Site Selection and Breeding Parameters in Secondary Hole Nesters — a Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
74
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Their inclusion is noteworthy because they constitute only a small fraction of the plants available as nesting materials within the wider environment, and yet they are highly sought after because they contain a high abundance of volatile secondary metabolites that reduce the abundance of a range of nest-dwelling parasites (Belandrin et al, 1985;Dubiec et al, 2013). Accordingly, there is evidence that birds mitigate the effects of parasites by choosing nest sites containing few parasites (Mappes et al, 1994;Rendell and Verbeek, 1996;Mazgajski, 2007;Suárez-Rodríguez et al, 2013) and by incorporating aromatic plant materials into their nests to reduce either the abundance or virulence of parasites (Wimberger, 1984;Clark and Mason, 1985, 1988Clark, 1991;Shutler and Campbell, 2007). Both blue tits and great tits incorporate aromatic plants into their nests (Cowie and Hinsley, 1988;Bańbura et al, 1995) and detailed studies of Corsican blue tits have shown that nest-building females incorporate between one and five aromatic herb species into their nests (Lambrechts and dos Santos, 2000;Lafuma et al, 2001;Petit et al, 2002;Lambrechts et al, 2008;Mennerat et al, 2008).…”
Section: Parasite Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their inclusion is noteworthy because they constitute only a small fraction of the plants available as nesting materials within the wider environment, and yet they are highly sought after because they contain a high abundance of volatile secondary metabolites that reduce the abundance of a range of nest-dwelling parasites (Belandrin et al, 1985;Dubiec et al, 2013). Accordingly, there is evidence that birds mitigate the effects of parasites by choosing nest sites containing few parasites (Mappes et al, 1994;Rendell and Verbeek, 1996;Mazgajski, 2007;Suárez-Rodríguez et al, 2013) and by incorporating aromatic plant materials into their nests to reduce either the abundance or virulence of parasites (Wimberger, 1984;Clark and Mason, 1985, 1988Clark, 1991;Shutler and Campbell, 2007). Both blue tits and great tits incorporate aromatic plants into their nests (Cowie and Hinsley, 1988;Bańbura et al, 1995) and detailed studies of Corsican blue tits have shown that nest-building females incorporate between one and five aromatic herb species into their nests (Lambrechts and dos Santos, 2000;Lafuma et al, 2001;Petit et al, 2002;Lambrechts et al, 2008;Mennerat et al, 2008).…”
Section: Parasite Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loye & Zuk 1991, Møller 1997, also in cavity-nesting species (Mazgajski 2007a, Wiebe 2009). Changing of a nest site could reduce parasitism rates (Collias & Collias 1984, Hansell 2000, and woodpeckers could avoid parasites by excavating new cavities (Short 1979).…”
Section: Three-toed Woodpeckers In Old Cavities and Nest Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time available for breeding is, however, limited, especially in northern latitudes, and cavity-excavating species can save time by reusing old nest holes. Obviously, cavity-excavating bird species are likely to face a trade-off between excavating a new cavity and reusing an old one, and the decision depends on, e.g., population structure or different risks such as predation, competition and ectoparasitism (Short 1979, Aitken et al 2002, Wiebe et al 2006, Mazgajski 2007a. The use of an old cavity may also be beneficial because woodpeckers have previously found it structurally sound, its location is advantageous for feeding or previous nesting attempts were successful (see Aitken & Martin 2004, Wiebe et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these responses are complementary and may be induced in adults, nestlings or both (Hart 1992, Keymer and Read 1991, Simon et al 2005. Nesting adults may avoid nest sites with high ectoparasite loads (Moore 2002), due to the association between old nest material and higher abundance of certain types of ectoparasites (Mazgajski 2007, Tomás et al 2007, López-Arrabé et al 2012) and bacteria . Adults may also take measures to indirectly minimize the effects of nest parasites through incorporation of fresh plant material containing compounds that either directly affect the development of parasites (Malan et al 2002, Clark and Mason 1988, Lafuma et al 2001, Tomás et al 2012 or stimulate elements of the immune system of chicks that help them to cope better with the harmful activities of ectoparasites (Mennerat et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%