2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-019-4208-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW) Application on Soil Properties and Wheat Growth Performance Under Rain-Fed Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is considered as one of the most contaminated and hazardous food industry residues to the environment (9), especially from producing countries (10). This is due to its diverse organic structure, vast quantity, and complexity in treating, as well as the lack of practicable or cost-effective OMW treatments (5,11). Therefore, it must be disposed of by dumping it immediately into the air, most often in waste streams, storing it in evaporation ponds, or spreading it out to the ground, resulting in soil blockage, surface and ground water pollution, and the release of unpleasant odors.…”
Section: Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered as one of the most contaminated and hazardous food industry residues to the environment (9), especially from producing countries (10). This is due to its diverse organic structure, vast quantity, and complexity in treating, as well as the lack of practicable or cost-effective OMW treatments (5,11). Therefore, it must be disposed of by dumping it immediately into the air, most often in waste streams, storing it in evaporation ponds, or spreading it out to the ground, resulting in soil blockage, surface and ground water pollution, and the release of unpleasant odors.…”
Section: Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are similar and exceed those of Mekki et al (2006aMekki et al ( , 2006b, who reported a 5% yield increase in wheat under olive wastewater treatment compared to the control sample as a result of the increase in both kernel weight and ears per plant. Mechri et al (2008); Saadi et al (2013); and Mohawesh et al (2019) reported that phenolic content was decreased after a period of adding OMWW, which might be the case in the current study due to the two-month waiting period. Therefore, the observed increase in the bacterial cell's numbers in all OMWW-treated soils was due to the decreased inhibitory effect of phenolic compounds accompanied by a high organic matter content, which plays an essential role in supplying the bacterial cells with the nutrients and energy needed for their activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The spectrophotometer (ultraviolet-1601PC; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used for the quantitative analysis of P in samples using the method proposed by Watanabe and Olsen (1965), whereas the atomic absorption spectrometer was used to determine Ca and K (Mohawesh, 2016). Total N was determined using the Kjeldahl method described in the work by Mohawesh et al (2019). The chlorophyll content in plants was determined for a fully expanded, healthy leaf from each plant using a chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502; Konica Minolta Sensing, Osaka, Japan) in triplicate (Alamro et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%