2006
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-0612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Opening Midlevel Neonatal Intensive Care Units on the Location of Low Birth Weight Births in California

Abstract: The introduction of new midlevel units was associated with significant shifts of births from both high-level and low-level hospitals to midlevel hospitals. In areas in which new midlevel units opened, the majority of the increase in midlevel deliveries was attributable to shifts from high-level unit births. Continued proliferation of midlevel units should be carefully assessed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The availability of obstetricians in a county and the presence of hospitals reporting the ability to provide more complex services, although they had no local neonatologists, were associated with a lower likelihood that women with preterm births delivered in neonatology-staffed NICU. This verifies the findings of others (Gould et al 1999;Haberland, Phibbs, and Baker 2006) that perceived local expertise reduces the likelihood of use of more appropriate delivery facilities, and the finding persisted when examining only births at o33 weeks gestation. As the overall trend analysis suggested, there were no significant associations between the ANGELS intervention and delivery at an NICU.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The availability of obstetricians in a county and the presence of hospitals reporting the ability to provide more complex services, although they had no local neonatologists, were associated with a lower likelihood that women with preterm births delivered in neonatology-staffed NICU. This verifies the findings of others (Gould et al 1999;Haberland, Phibbs, and Baker 2006) that perceived local expertise reduces the likelihood of use of more appropriate delivery facilities, and the finding persisted when examining only births at o33 weeks gestation. As the overall trend analysis suggested, there were no significant associations between the ANGELS intervention and delivery at an NICU.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Over the past two decades there has been an increase in the number of hospitals claiming to provide neonatal intensive care at some level, even if they have a relatively low volume of patients and lack full-time coverage by neonatologists (Richardson, Reed, and Cutler 1995;Goodman et al 2001;Howell et al 2002). Perinatal regionalization to tertiary settings is reduced in locales with more availability of intermediate NICU hospital settings because of shifts in obstetrics referral patterns (Powell et al 1995;Gould et al 1999;Haberland, Phibbs, and Baker 2006;Zeitlin et al 2008).…”
Section: Perinatal Regionalization As a Physician Referral Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It results in less‐severe lung disease and fewer related complications, including fewer cases of intraventricular haemorrhage and chronic lung disease 19–21 . Transfer of the pregnant woman to a tertiary level centre for very preterm delivery is also associated with higher levels of survival 22–24 . The use of caesarean section for very preterm deliveries in the absence of other obstetric indications is controversial and there is an ongoing debate about its impact on very preterm survival and morbidity 25–27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite more units, access to care for low birth weight infants in California has not appreciably changed, as evidenced by a small reduction in deliveries in lowerlevel units. 6 Instead, it has resulted in the diffusion of delivery volume from centralized, higher-level units to the more abundant, midlevel units. If hospital volume, rather than the level of care or the presence of hospital specialty services, is the primary factor for improved outcomes for high-risk pregnancies and newborns, then this trend is certainly worrisome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%