2010 International Conference on Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccceng.2010.5560365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of operating conditions on emission concentration of PAHs during fluidized bed air gasification of biomass

Abstract: With the concern of future energy use, hydrogen is taken as an important role in energy alternatives. In addition, biomass air gasification by using fluidized bed is an efficient and advanced method for hydrogen production. Despite of energy product generation, some pollutants such as PAHs easily formed in gasification process because of tar decomposition. Accordingly, this study provides a fundamental work of emission behavior of PAHs generated under different operating conditions such as temperature, air fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak production of total GC-detectable tar is observed for both feedstocks between 750 and 800 °C, which is in line with the trends observed for other feedstocks. 8,9 For torrefied M×G, the total GC-detectable tar did not decrease significantly after its peak production at 750 °C, which can be attributed to (1) decomposition of some heavy GC undetectable tar into the GCdetectable tar fraction due to thermal tar cracking, 9,35 (2) higher thermal stability of light PAHs due to the higher content of aromatic lignin in torrefied M×G 7 resulting in higher total GCdetectable tar yield, and (3) limited steam reforming of tars due to lower water content in the product gas derived from torrefied M×G.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak production of total GC-detectable tar is observed for both feedstocks between 750 and 800 °C, which is in line with the trends observed for other feedstocks. 8,9 For torrefied M×G, the total GC-detectable tar did not decrease significantly after its peak production at 750 °C, which can be attributed to (1) decomposition of some heavy GC undetectable tar into the GCdetectable tar fraction due to thermal tar cracking, 9,35 (2) higher thermal stability of light PAHs due to the higher content of aromatic lignin in torrefied M×G 7 resulting in higher total GCdetectable tar yield, and (3) limited steam reforming of tars due to lower water content in the product gas derived from torrefied M×G.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%