2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wen.2022.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of operating variables on CO2 adsorption capacity of activated carbon, kaolinite, and activated carbon – kaolinite composite adsorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the maximum adsorption capacity of CO 2 on Ce 0.5 Cu 0.5 O was 5.72 cm 3 /g at 30 °C. This value is comparable to those of CuO (9.0 cm 3 /g) and Cu 2 O (2.1 cm 3 /g) [46]. This may have occurred due to a low affinity to CO 2 to interact with the surface of Ce-O-Cu.…”
Section: Studies On Co 2 Uptakesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the maximum adsorption capacity of CO 2 on Ce 0.5 Cu 0.5 O was 5.72 cm 3 /g at 30 °C. This value is comparable to those of CuO (9.0 cm 3 /g) and Cu 2 O (2.1 cm 3 /g) [46]. This may have occurred due to a low affinity to CO 2 to interact with the surface of Ce-O-Cu.…”
Section: Studies On Co 2 Uptakesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Greater surface area, pore size, and volume result in higher adsorption capacity. The surface area and pore diameter of Ce 0.5 Cu 0.5 O (17.63 m 2 /g and 39.38 nm) synthesized in our work were higher than those of CuO (4.21 m 2 /g and 35.2 nm) and Cu 2 O (1.36 m 2 /g and 9.89 nm) [46]. However, Ce 0.5 Cu 0.5 O presented a higher CO 2 capture capacity than Cu 2 O but a lower capacity than CuO.…”
Section: Studies On Co 2 Uptakecontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The SO 2 adsorption capacity improved from 0.35 to 0.49 mmol g −1 with an increase in the oxide loading from 0.25 to 0.45 g. The increasing mass (increasing bed height) improves the gas retention time, which provides a better chance for a gas molecule to interact with the active sites. This increased adsorbate-adsorbent interaction enhances the gas adsorption capacity 40 . The effect of gas flow rate was studied between 0.1-0.3 L min −1 with a constant adsorbent mass of 0.25 g (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The inverse relationship was a consequence of a lowering in gas retention time and limited adsorbate–adsorbent interactions with increasing flow rate. 44 Another aspect of the lower gas flow rate was the restricted evolution of NO gas at the outlet, which decreased from 9.9% (0.2 L min −1 ) to 5.1% for a flow rate of 0.1 L min −1 . This decreased NO evolution was also related to the increased gas retention time with a decreased flow rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%