2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1234-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of oral appliance on endothelial function in sleep apnea

Abstract: Endothelial function can be improved following effective treatment of OSAS using MAD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with moderate and severe OSA had increased levels of serum NO levels and higher flow-mediated dilatation after implanting intra-oral devices advancing the mandible 78. Mandibular advancement device and CPAP have reduced AHI and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores but CPAP was more efficacious.…”
Section: Effects Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with moderate and severe OSA had increased levels of serum NO levels and higher flow-mediated dilatation after implanting intra-oral devices advancing the mandible 78. Mandibular advancement device and CPAP have reduced AHI and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores but CPAP was more efficacious.…”
Section: Effects Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After consensus meetings, the reviewers agreed on the methodological quality of all articles. Nine articles were considered of low [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] and 16 articles of sufficient [46][47][48][49][50] methodological quality, including 11 RCTs (n=719 patients) [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] (Table 1 shows the study characteristics of articles with sufficient methodological quality).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion of the studies with sufficient methodological quality 46,47,49,50 in the metaanalyses of daytime SBP and DBP had no influence on the overall effect (mean difference from baseline -1.92 mmHg (95% CI -3.47 to -0.38), p=0.01 and -2.45 mmHg (95% CI -3.93 to -0.97), p=0.001 for SBP and DBP, respectively). Sensitivity analyses showed a strong influence of the study by Gotsopoulos 51 on daytime SBP.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Outcomes Blood Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations