2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2258496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of out-of-plane specimen movement on the accuracy of the smallest specimen strain measurable using the digital image correlation technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with ARAMIS used by Poling and Desai (2017) in their previous work, Improved DIC is a viable option. However, there are drawbacks to the open-source option.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison with ARAMIS used by Poling and Desai (2017) in their previous work, Improved DIC is a viable option. However, there are drawbacks to the open-source option.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest strains accurately measurable using DIC techniques, over a range of specimen out-of-plane displacement amplitudes, were determined. Pfauth, T., & Poling, J. (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study built upon an initial investigation conducted by the collaborating US and Danish partners that concluded that out-ofplane specimen movement results in noise in DIC-based strain measurements 10,11,12 . In the current investigation, the effect of specimen out-of-plane displacement on the accuracy of strain measurements implementing the 2D 13,14 and 3D measurement techniques using both the aforementioned tools was determined over a range of strain values and specimen out-of-plane displacements. The minimum resolutions of the four DIC-based measurement techniques (2D ARAMIS, 3D ARAMIS, 2D iMETRUM, and 3D iMETRUM) in measuring strains under the effect of specimen out-of-plane displacements were determined and their accuracies compared.…”
Section: Project Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%