2002
DOI: 10.1108/09615530210434296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of outlet positions and various turbulence models on mixing in a single and multi strand tundish

Abstract: The Navier‐Stokes equation and the species continuity equation have been solved numerically in a boundary fitted coordinate system comprising the geometry of a large scale industrial size tundish. The solution of the species continuity equation predicts the time evolution of the concentration of a tracer at the outlet of a single strand bare tundish. The numerical prediction of the tracer concentration has been made with three different turbulence models; (a standard k‐ε, a k‐ε RNG and a Low Re number Lam‐Brem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A larger peak value of concentration at early time indicates short-circuiting phenomena inside the tundish and contributes to the formation of large dead regions inside the tundish. A smaller peak value contributes to better mixing parameters, such as a large value of mean residence time and the ratio of mixed to dead volume inside the tundish [8][9]. It is hence anticipated that delaying the appearance of the tracer from the outlet near the inlet by closing it for some time after tracer injection may affect the fluid flow inside the tundish, and then, the mixing characteristics may be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger peak value of concentration at early time indicates short-circuiting phenomena inside the tundish and contributes to the formation of large dead regions inside the tundish. A smaller peak value contributes to better mixing parameters, such as a large value of mean residence time and the ratio of mixed to dead volume inside the tundish [8][9]. It is hence anticipated that delaying the appearance of the tracer from the outlet near the inlet by closing it for some time after tracer injection may affect the fluid flow inside the tundish, and then, the mixing characteristics may be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turbulent quantities, k and ε, on the first near wall cell have been set from the equilibrium log law wall function as has been described by Jha and Dash et al [2][3][4]. The turbulent intensity at the inlet of the nozzle has been set to 2% with the inlet velocity being known and the back flow turbulent intensity at all the pressure outlet boundaries has been set to 5%.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the turbulence prescription can be found from the authors article. 20,21) The top surface of the vessel was set to a zero shear stress condition where the gas bubbles were allowed to escape. Once the solution reached steady state the tracer dispersion equation was solved where the inlet of the tracer injection point was set to mass fraction of 1 for 1 s. This was achieved in 5 equal time steps of 0.2 s each.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%