1981
DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Participation in Marketing Research on Consumer Attitudes toward Research and Satisfaction with a Service

Abstract: In on-site research the sponsor is often obvious. Whether participation in research creates consumer dissatisfaction with being in the study and with the sponsor's service is an important question. Using an experimental design, the authors investigated consumer reaction to and satisfaction with participation in on-site research and the food and service in a restaurant. The effect of a pretest also was studied. Results indicate a positive response to the research and no adverse effects on the sponsor. No effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were first asked to answer survey questions on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree,” and 7 = “strongly agree”) regarding perceptions of privacy control (“I had little reason to be concerned about my privacy in this store”; “I controlled my level of privacy within the store”; “I had control over who I dealt with”; α = .84; Alge et al 2006), anxiety (“Please rate how the overall shopping trip described in the video would make you feel: anxious, nervous, tense”; α = .95; Dubé and Morgan 1996; Lau-Gesk and Meyers-Levy 2009; Luce 1998), and satisfaction (“Overall, I am satisfied with my shopping trip today”; “This shopping experience was very satisfactory”; “I felt good about my shopping trip”; “I was happy with my shopping trip”; α = .98; Hausknecht 1990; Swan, Trawick, and Carroll 1981). Because all reliabilities were satisfactory, mean scores were calculated.…”
Section: Study 2: Examination Of the Interaction And Mediation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were first asked to answer survey questions on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree,” and 7 = “strongly agree”) regarding perceptions of privacy control (“I had little reason to be concerned about my privacy in this store”; “I controlled my level of privacy within the store”; “I had control over who I dealt with”; α = .84; Alge et al 2006), anxiety (“Please rate how the overall shopping trip described in the video would make you feel: anxious, nervous, tense”; α = .95; Dubé and Morgan 1996; Lau-Gesk and Meyers-Levy 2009; Luce 1998), and satisfaction (“Overall, I am satisfied with my shopping trip today”; “This shopping experience was very satisfactory”; “I felt good about my shopping trip”; “I was happy with my shopping trip”; α = .98; Hausknecht 1990; Swan, Trawick, and Carroll 1981). Because all reliabilities were satisfactory, mean scores were calculated.…”
Section: Study 2: Examination Of the Interaction And Mediation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that stating expectations also generates more-negative evaluations might be explained by both the negativity enhancement and vigilant processing accounts, because stating expectations, similar to expecting to evaluate, is likely to cause customers to pay more attention online to performance aspects that do not meet expectations. In a prior study that included a manipulation of stated expectations, Swan, Trawick, and Carroll (1981) asked customers seated at a particular section of a restaurant to state their food and service expectations immediately after they submitted their orders, whereas customers seated at a different section were not asked for their expectations. Although Swan, Trawick, and Carroll did not expect stated expectations to influence subsequent evaluations (building on work by Bridge et al 1977), those in the stated expectations group tended to rate the restaurant less favorably on the majority of the items (particularly on two service dimensions).…”
Section: Study 1: the Effect Of Expecting To Evaluate And Stating Expectations On Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When performance is equal or superior to expectations, disconfirmation is positive. The majority of empirical findings support a positive relationship between expectations and satisfaction (e.g., 6,53,64).…”
Section: Relationship Between Consumers' Experience and Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 98%