2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-5910(01)00432-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of particle diameter on fluidization under vibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…electromagnetic field, acoustic and mechanical agitation and centrifugal field [6]. Among those, mechanical vibration can significantly reduce the occurrence of channelling compared to that in the conventional fluidised beds [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Other advantages include reduced minimum fluidisation velocity and elutriation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electromagnetic field, acoustic and mechanical agitation and centrifugal field [6]. Among those, mechanical vibration can significantly reduce the occurrence of channelling compared to that in the conventional fluidised beds [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Other advantages include reduced minimum fluidisation velocity and elutriation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noda et al (1998) gave the flow patterns of fine particles in a vibrating fluidized bed under atmospheric or reduced pressure. Mawatari et al (2002bMawatari et al ( , 2003 examined the effects of vibration and particle diameter on flow patterns and fluidization characteristics, including minimum fluidization velocity, voidage and the bed expansion ratio for…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fluidize the bed of these particles, a vibrated fluidized bed has been applied to some industries (Mori et al, 1990), and some workers have studied the vibrated fluidized bed (Gupta and Mujumdar, 1980;Jataiz et al, 1992;Maring et al, 1994;Tatemoto et al, 2001;Zhou et al, 2002;Mawatari et al, 2002). When the vibration is added to the particle bed, the minimum fluidization velocity becomes smaller ( Maring et al, 1994;Mawatari et al, 2003) and the vibration gap, which is the gap between particle bed and wall, appears .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the stable agglomerates are not formed or the cohesive force between particles (or agglomerates) is large, particles are fixed in the bed without vibration. Even in this case, the particles move in the bed when the vibration is added to the bed (Mawatari et al, , 2002. Though there is no bubble in the bed, the fluidization can be identified by measuring the pressure loss in bed (Mawatari et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%