2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of particle–particle interaction on the bed pressure drop and bubble flow by computational particle-fluid dynamics simulation of bubbling fluidized beds with shroud nozzle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Snider et al [27] presented application of the hybrid Euler-Lagrange method for modeling the gasification process in large industrial fluidized bed reactors. Lim et al [28] carried out CPFD simulations in bubbling fluidized beds, and they found that bed pressure drops are similar to those obtained from experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Snider et al [27] presented application of the hybrid Euler-Lagrange method for modeling the gasification process in large industrial fluidized bed reactors. Lim et al [28] carried out CPFD simulations in bubbling fluidized beds, and they found that bed pressure drops are similar to those obtained from experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Zhang et al [8] evaluated CO 2 14 capture from ambient air in a laboratory-scale bubbling fluidized bed using 1.0 kg adsorbents, and obtained a high pressure drop of around 2500 Pa at a low flow rate. Lim et al [28] carried out CPFD simulations in a bubbling fluidized bed containing large amounts of particles at a high flow rate, and achieved a very high pressure drop of 9450 Pa. A very high pressure drop of 7500 Pa in a large-scale fluidized bed column was also published by Chen et al [25].…”
Section: Experimental Process Designmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, particle–particle interaction will not have a relatively large effect. [ 50 ] However, in this study on the AOR, particle–particle interaction is predicted to be a large variable because θp is very close to θitaliccp in the part where the AOR is formed.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…widely used for numerical simulation of dilute and dense particulate systems, e.g., circulating fluidised bed riser [41], dilute pneumatic conveying [23], bubbling fluidised beds [42,55].…”
Section: Drag Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%