2022
DOI: 10.5829/ije.2022.35.09c.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Particle Size, Moisture Content and Density on the Hyperbolic Model Parameters for Non-cohesive Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also reported that the results for settlement and horizontal displacement considering thin layer interface shows very good agreement with the experimental result. Experiment Agrawal [51] With zero thickness Viladkar et al [33] Without Joint Viladkar et al [33] Present Study Thin layer Experiment Agrawal [51] With zero thickness Zedan [52] Present Study Thin layer Experiment Agrawal [51] With zero thickness Zedan [52] Present Study Thin layer Experiment Agrawal [51] With zero thickness Zedan [52] Present Study Thin layer It is also noted that the results considering thin layer interface are superior to zero thickness interface. It may be because of consideration of normal stiffness for thin layer interface as 'ET/t' and not a constant value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also reported that the results for settlement and horizontal displacement considering thin layer interface shows very good agreement with the experimental result. Experiment Agrawal [51] With zero thickness Viladkar et al [33] Without Joint Viladkar et al [33] Present Study Thin layer Experiment Agrawal [51] With zero thickness Zedan [52] Present Study Thin layer Experiment Agrawal [51] With zero thickness Zedan [52] Present Study Thin layer Experiment Agrawal [51] With zero thickness Zedan [52] Present Study Thin layer It is also noted that the results considering thin layer interface are superior to zero thickness interface. It may be because of consideration of normal stiffness for thin layer interface as 'ET/t' and not a constant value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the adjacent mesh size fluctuates, the thickness value is inconsistent and altering regardless of soil type or structure surface roughness. According to the literature, the interface thickness should be five times the average soil grain size [6,11,13,[30][31][32][33]. Whereas Fang H. and Wang W. [34], Saberi et al [35] and Gennaro et al [36] proposed the interface thickness should be 5 to 10 times the average particle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%