Effect of Patient Weight on the Anticoagulant Response to Adjusted Therapeutic Dosage of Low-Molecular- Weight Heparin for the Treatment ofVenous Thromboembolism
Abstract:Data evaluating the safety of using weight-based dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in obese patients are limited. Some manufacturers have recommended a maximum daily dose of LMWH not to be exceeded. The purpose of this study was to determine if body weight influenced the anticoagulant response to a weight-based dose of LMWH for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Patients with serum creatinine levels <150 µmol/l receiving the LMWH , dalteparin 200 anti-Xa IU/kg based on actual body weight subc… Show more
“…9 Supporting the use of anti-factor Xa monitoring in patients with renal failure is the different potential for accumulation among the various LMWH preparations and the absence of a clear threshold of creatinine clearance for identification of patients at increased risk for accumulation. 41 Obese patients have been under-represented in treatment trials using LMWH, and although individual LMWH preparations have shown predictable antifactor Xa levels in this patient group, 42,43 measuring levels on at least 1 occasion seems prudent.…”
Section: Comparative Efficacy and Safety Of Ufh And Lmwhmentioning
Abstract-Adequate initial anticoagulant therapy of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is required to prevent thrombus growth and pulmonary embolism (PE). Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is being replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as the anticoagulant of choice for initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Both agents are relatively safe and effective when used to treat VTE, with LMWH suitable for outpatient therapy because of improved bioavailability and more predictable anticoagulant response. Serious potential complications of heparin therapy, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis, seem less common with LMWH. The potential for fetal harm and changes in maternal physiology complicate the treatment of VTE during pregnancy. Although systemic thrombolysis is used in patients with massive PE and in some patients with proximal DVT, controversy persists with respect to appropriate patient selection for this intervention. Key Words: venous thromboembolism Ⅲ pulmonary embolism Ⅲ deep venous thrombosis Ⅲ anticoagulants Ⅲ thrombosis Ⅲ heparin
“…9 Supporting the use of anti-factor Xa monitoring in patients with renal failure is the different potential for accumulation among the various LMWH preparations and the absence of a clear threshold of creatinine clearance for identification of patients at increased risk for accumulation. 41 Obese patients have been under-represented in treatment trials using LMWH, and although individual LMWH preparations have shown predictable antifactor Xa levels in this patient group, 42,43 measuring levels on at least 1 occasion seems prudent.…”
Section: Comparative Efficacy and Safety Of Ufh And Lmwhmentioning
Abstract-Adequate initial anticoagulant therapy of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is required to prevent thrombus growth and pulmonary embolism (PE). Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is being replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as the anticoagulant of choice for initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Both agents are relatively safe and effective when used to treat VTE, with LMWH suitable for outpatient therapy because of improved bioavailability and more predictable anticoagulant response. Serious potential complications of heparin therapy, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis, seem less common with LMWH. The potential for fetal harm and changes in maternal physiology complicate the treatment of VTE during pregnancy. Although systemic thrombolysis is used in patients with massive PE and in some patients with proximal DVT, controversy persists with respect to appropriate patient selection for this intervention. Key Words: venous thromboembolism Ⅲ pulmonary embolism Ⅲ deep venous thrombosis Ⅲ anticoagulants Ⅲ thrombosis Ⅲ heparin
“…Das gleiche fand sich für Tinzaparin bis 165 kg (24) und für Dalteparin bis zu 190 kg (25)(26)(27). Allerdings waren in diese Studien nur zufällig einige Patienten mit hohem BMI eingeschlossen.…”
Section: Aber Wer Möchte So Etwas Schon Jedesmal Ausrechnen? Ist Es üunclassified
ZusammenfassungPatienten der bariatrischen Chirurgie sind eine Hochrisikogruppe für venöse Thromboembo-lien. Die aktuellen Leitlinien der AWMF (Deutschland), NICE (Großbritannien) und der ACCP (USA) werden vorgestellt, und es erfolgt eine Diskussion der Literatur zum Thema. Frühmobilisation und physikalische Methoden sind die Basismaßnahmen zur Thromboseprophylaxe für alle Patienten. Zusätzlich ist in der Regel eine medikamentöse Prophylaxe indiziert. Mittel der Wahl sind heute niedermolekulare Heparine. Evidenz-basierte Dosisempfehlungen für bariatrische Patienten liegen nicht vor. Wir empfehlen eine viertel therapeutische Dosis von niedermolekularen Heparinen ohne Gewichts-Obergrenze einmal täglich s.c. Der Beginn soll am Tag vor der OP sein. Alternative ist Fondaparinux in einer Fixdosis von 1 x 2,5 mg s.c. Gegen das Thrombose- muss individuell das Blutungsrisiko abgewogen werden.
“…Os trabalhos que avaliaram esse subgrupo usaram o peso atual dos pacientes para o cálculo da dose da HBPM a ser usada. (16)(17)(18)(19) Em pacientes com insuficiência renal grave, deve-se usar preferencialmente a HNF ao invés da HBPM. (C) A infusão contínua de HNF i.v.…”
Section: Hnf Ou Com Hbpm(a) Dando-se Preferência à Hbpm(a)unclassified
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.