2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of peri-implantitis associated horizontal bone loss on stress distribution around dental implants – A 3D finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, previous studies have generally considered only a static masticatory load, [37,[74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]. However, in addition to static load, the current study considered quasistatic and dynamic loading rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, previous studies have generally considered only a static masticatory load, [37,[74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]. However, in addition to static load, the current study considered quasistatic and dynamic loading rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to bone strain, it was observed with FEA that, regardless the implant system, Von-Misses stress in the implant and in the screw was higher when there is a bone loss situation, which corroborates with previous studies that have evaluated bone loss in dental implants. [33][34][35] When evaluating the screws, it is possible to observe a high stress concentration in the screw neck in all groups. This finding can indicate loosening or even fracture of these screws similarly between Morse taper and external hexagon systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior was exactly what occurred with both implant systems in the present study, showing that both areas will be affected by the new fulcrum position formed in implant/bone lever. 35,36 The micro strain results were calculated by strain gauges. This method is based on the principle of electrical conductivity, considering terminals that have active areas of 3mm 2 , which will accurately measure the strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most previous studies did not consider the crown and abutment screw components of the prosthetic [34,69,71,72], and hence the clinical application of the FEA findings is somewhat limited. Furthermore, previous studies have generally considered only a static masticatory load, [34,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. However, in addition to static load, the current study considered quasi-static and dynamic loading rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%