2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pH-shifting treatment on the structural and functional properties of soybean protein isolate and its interactions with (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The free sulfhydryl group concentration is an important parameter that affects the protein interface and emulsification behavior, the difference in which could reflect the effect of EDTAD acylation treatment on the covalent interactions of protein 6 . More hydrophobic residues could be exposed on the surface of the SPI, which would lead to the enhancement of surface hydrophobicity H 0 33 . The higher the surface hydrophobicity, the higher the degree of unfolding in the protein molecule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free sulfhydryl group concentration is an important parameter that affects the protein interface and emulsification behavior, the difference in which could reflect the effect of EDTAD acylation treatment on the covalent interactions of protein 6 . More hydrophobic residues could be exposed on the surface of the SPI, which would lead to the enhancement of surface hydrophobicity H 0 33 . The higher the surface hydrophobicity, the higher the degree of unfolding in the protein molecule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic quenching constant ( K SV ) and static quenching constant ( K q ) were calculated based on the Stern–Volmer equation. For static quenching reactions, the binding constant ( K A ) and the number of binding sites ( n ) can be calculated as follows 16 : F0Fgoodbreak=1goodbreak+KSV[]Qgoodbreak=1goodbreak+Kqτ0[]Q lg()F0FFgoodbreak=lgKAgoodbreak+italicnlg[]Q where F 0 and F are the fluorescence intensity of the sample solution in the absence and the presence of the quencher, respectively; [Q] is the concentration of GA (mol L −1 ), K SV and K q are the dynamic quenching constant (L mol −1 ) and static quenching constant (L/mol•s), respectively, and τ 0 is the average lifetime of the fluorophore in the absence of the quencher (s).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic quenching constant (K SV ) and static quenching constant (K q ) were calculated based on the Stern-Volmer equation. For static quenching reactions, the binding constant (K A ) and the number of binding sites (n) can be calculated as follows 16 :…”
Section: Characterization Of Complexes Fluorescence Quenching Mechani...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a Schrödinger Sitemap, four binding pockets were obtained on soybean 11S glycinin. To evaluate the accessibility of four pockets, molecular docking was carried out using epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a known SPI binder [3,19], as the ligand. As shown in Figure 1, EGCG was docked into the four pockets individually.…”
Section: Binding-pocket Identification and Egcg Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%