2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pH, transmembrane pressure and whey proteins on the properties of casein micelle deposit layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the lowest pressure, the deposit height is most pronounced at ϑ = 45 • C and least pronounced at ϑ = 15 • C. At temperatures ϑ > 40 • C milk tends to undergo structural changes [49], which leads to stronger bonds between the milk proteins and the formation of agglomerates, which intrinsically influences compressibility. In the case of aggregation, the deposit layer would grow faster when compared to smaller molecules [20].…”
Section: Effect Of Pressure and Temperature On Deposit Layer Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the lowest pressure, the deposit height is most pronounced at ϑ = 45 • C and least pronounced at ϑ = 15 • C. At temperatures ϑ > 40 • C milk tends to undergo structural changes [49], which leads to stronger bonds between the milk proteins and the formation of agglomerates, which intrinsically influences compressibility. In the case of aggregation, the deposit layer would grow faster when compared to smaller molecules [20].…”
Section: Effect Of Pressure and Temperature On Deposit Layer Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deposit formation is thus reduced where the transmembrane pressure is gradually reaching lower levels, while shear forces transporting deposited material away from the membrane surface stay the same (if one neglects the minimal amount of permeate reducing the volume flow from module inlet to outlet). Kühnl et al [16] and Steinhauer et al [20] have further extended these insights by indirectly studying the effect of colloidal interactions between particles in the deposited layer at the membrane. There is room for optimizing the efficiency of, e.g., milk protein fractionation by creating more or less open porous deposits as a result of varying attractive or repulsive forces between particles as a function of pH and ionic strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is clear in appearance and, most importantly, virtually free from microorganisms [ 9 , 10 ]. The focus of recent research regarding milk protein fractionation by microfiltration concentrated on the separation of casein micelles and the major whey proteins α-lactalbumin (α-La) and β-lactoglobulin (β-Lg) and/or the quantification of the obtained casein/whey protein ratio in the MF concentrate [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. However, there is a lack of information regarding the performance of the membranes for separating minor whey proteins such as the immunoglobulin fraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane filtration is an operation widely used to process soft particles as for example in waste water treatment 13,14 , and dairy filtration 15,16 . The biggest challenges are cake layer formation and membrane fouling 17,18 , in both cases, membranes lose part of their permeability and consequently the filtration process loses efficiency 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%