“…To the Editor: The authors performed an elegant meta-analysis and concluded, “This meta-analysis showed that antimuscarinic agents statistically significantly increased the incidences of urinary tract infection (UTI) and lower urinary tract symptoms and dysfunction, but β 3 -adrenoceptor agonists did not.” 1 They note “direct comparisons between antimuscarinics and β 3 -adrenoreceptor antagonists by using only head-to-head [randomized controlled trial] data would be ideal, more reliable, and more informative.” However, they failed to note that in the best existing comparator of the therapies, a single randomized study by Abrams et al (which was referenced in their paper), 2 the comparisons between placebo (3.7% in 81 patients), mirabegron 25 mg (1.3% in 77 patients), mirabegron 50 mg (2.6% in 78 patients), and solifenacin 5 mg (2.6% in 156 patients) do not support their conclusion (see Table). Similarly, the SYNERGY II study, a randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study comparing the long-term safety and efficacy of mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg in combination with monotherapy, reported no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent UTIs between mirabegron 50 mg (6.2% in 305 patients) and solifenacin 5 mg (5.9% in 303 patients), but slightly increased rates of UTI in the combination group (8.4% of 1,206 patients).…”