2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04717-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of phosphate and silicate on selenite uptake and phloem-mediated transport in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In tomato, addition of a high Si dose (1 mM) significantly decreased root concentration of Se at pH 3, but had no effect at higher (up to 8) pH ( Wang et al, 2019 ). Such pH-dependent disparity on Si effect could partially be explained by Si-influx transporter affinity for Se form available at the given pH.…”
Section: Interactions Of Silicon With Beneficial Elementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In tomato, addition of a high Si dose (1 mM) significantly decreased root concentration of Se at pH 3, but had no effect at higher (up to 8) pH ( Wang et al, 2019 ). Such pH-dependent disparity on Si effect could partially be explained by Si-influx transporter affinity for Se form available at the given pH.…”
Section: Interactions Of Silicon With Beneficial Elementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wheat genotype 'Puelche' is the most Se-tolerant and has the greatest Se accumulation among the three wheat genotypes studied (i.e., 'Puelche', 'Tinto', and 'Kumpa'), such that its Se accumulation was related to the strongest transcript level of the sulfate transporter TaeSultr4.1 in roots [87]. In addition, other transporters also take part in Se transport, such as silicon transporters in rice [88] and tomato [89], phosphate/orthophosphate transporters in wheat [90], rice [91][92][93], tomato [89], and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) [94,95], and monocarboxylates transporters in yeast (S. cerevisiae) [96]. Thus, it is reasonable to explain the experimental results that plant availability of selenate and selenite was influenced by the competing ions phosphate and sulfate [97,98].…”
Section: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though, selenate is the main form of Se taken up by plants, and its transport across cell membranes is an energy-dependent process mediated by the sulphate transport system (Lima et al 2018; Schiavon and Pilon-Smits 2017a; White 2018). Competition events in soil between sulphate and selenate, as well as plant sulphate transporters (SULTR) differing in affinity for these two anions, influence the rate of selenate uptake by plants (El Mehdawi et al 2018;White et al 2004, White 2016 (Wang et al 2019;Zhao (FJ) et al 2010, b), while HSeO 3 − and part of SeO 3 2− mainly use lowand high-affinity P transporters (OsPT2), respectively (Zhang et al 2014).…”
Section: Selenium Uptake and Assimilation Pathways In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition events in soil between sulphate and selenate, as well as plant sulphate transporters (SULTR) differing in affinity for these two anions, influence the rate of selenate uptake by plants (El Mehdawi et al 2018 ; White et al 2004 , White 2016 ). Selenite compounds instead, are conveyed over plant cell membranes via phosphorus (P) and silicon (Si) transporters, with differences between selenite anion (SeO 3 2− ), hydrogenselenite ion (HSeO 3 − ), and selenous acid (H 2 SeO 3 ) (Wang et al 2019 ; Zhang et al 2014 ). Precisely, H 2 SeO 3 is transported by Si transporters (LSI1) and aquaporins (OsNIP2;1) (Wang et al 2019 ; Zhao (FJ) et al 2010 , b ), while HSeO 3 − and part of SeO 3 2− mainly use low- and high-affinity P transporters (OsPT2), respectively (Zhang et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Selenium Uptake and Assimilation Pathways In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%