2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-014-2042-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of phosphate status on the sorption and desorption properties of some soils of northern India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally accepted that the P buffer capacity (PBC), which is the soil solution resistance to a change in P concentration, is a crucial factor affecting equilibrium between solid and liquid phases (Holford 1980;Ehlert et al 2003;Celardin 2003). Factors such as soil P status (Barrow and Debnath 2014), the affinity of sorbent surfaces for P, or the proportion of exchangeable cations can also affect this equilibrium (Delgado et al 2010). All these factors contribute to explain the poor relationship frequently observed between a widely used index such as Olsen P (bicarbonateextractable P; Olsen et al 1954) and P uptake by plants (Kulhánek et al 2007), even in soils with similar properties (Delgado et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that the P buffer capacity (PBC), which is the soil solution resistance to a change in P concentration, is a crucial factor affecting equilibrium between solid and liquid phases (Holford 1980;Ehlert et al 2003;Celardin 2003). Factors such as soil P status (Barrow and Debnath 2014), the affinity of sorbent surfaces for P, or the proportion of exchangeable cations can also affect this equilibrium (Delgado et al 2010). All these factors contribute to explain the poor relationship frequently observed between a widely used index such as Olsen P (bicarbonateextractable P; Olsen et al 1954) and P uptake by plants (Kulhánek et al 2007), even in soils with similar properties (Delgado et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, P is less mobile and bioavailable than other macronutrients (Hinsinger 2001), which is particularly apparent in crops grown on strongly weathered soils (Raghothama and Karthikeyan 2005;DeLong et al 2013). This poor mobility requires using effective soil management systems and fertilization practices to increase the efficiency and bioavailability of P fertilizers (Barrow and Debnath 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been observed that sorption is less pronounced on heavily fertilized soils, due to more negative surface charge (Barrow and Debnath, 2014). In our study, high K m values imply the presence of many potential binding sites, where P may adsorb or precipitate.…”
Section: Relationship Between Soil Solution P Turnover (K M )mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…In many low-P w soils, sorption is extremely high and the soil solution is buffered from P inputs or outputs (Barrow and Debnath, 2014). For these soils, the prevalence of sites with fast exchange rates is crucial to assure a steady flux of P to the soil solution (Fig.…”
Section: Environmental Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation