Effect of Phosphorus Sources and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Growth and Productivity of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Youssef, Sabry M.; Riad, Gamal S.; Elhady, Salama Abd

doi:10.1007/s10343-017-0398-4

Cited by 13 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results presented in Figure 5 clearly reveal that, in both seasons, all treatments increased (p ≤ 0.05) nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in the shoot and the root of snap bean plants compared to the control treatment (T1). The results are in good accordance with those reported by Youssef et al [41], who found that different phosphorus sources affected N, P, K, Ca, Fe and Mn concentrations in the leaves.…”

Section: Effect Of Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers On The Nutrient (N P And K) Content Of Snap Bean Plantssupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Increasing P rates from 30 to 60 kg P 2 O 5 fed −1 significantly increased (p ≤ 0.05) the number of pods per plant, pod length (cm), pod diameter (mm), weight of pods per plant (g), weight of pod (g) and pod yield (ton ha −1 ). This result agreed with El-Azizy et al [41], who found that the enhanced yield after an application of phosphorus fertilizer indicated a strong relationship between dry matter accumulation and plant yield [29]. This may have been because the added phosphorus increased the number of branches per plant as well as the leaf area, which increased the photosynthesis area and the number of pods per plant [29].…”

Section: Effect Of Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers On The Nutrient (N P And K) Content Of Snap Bean Plantssupporting

confidence: 91%

“…These results are in harmony with those of Zahra et al [42], who reported that the maximum increase in the shoots and roots lengths reached 15.9 ± 0.3% and 3.8 ± 0.3% respectively, which was concurrent with improved P content in the plants. In this respect, Youssef et al [41] reported that the increase in N, P and K stimulated photosynthesis, which lead to improvements of the vegetative growth. The addition of phosphorus led to an increased root-to-shoot ratio and boosted the growth of lateral roots [43], which resulted in enhanced water and nutrient absorption.…”

Section: Effect Of Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers On The Nutrient (N P And K) Content Of Snap Bean Plantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, nanofertilizers are being tested as a new technology, either for soil or foliar applications, to improve food production and with a reduced environmental impact. Nano calcium phosphate (NCaP) was successfully synthesized, characterized and applied in this study. A pot experiment was carried out in two successive seasons in 2016 and 2017 on (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to obtain the best phosphorus treatments. The results were applied in a field experiment during the 2018–2019 season. Single superphosphate (SSP) at 30 and 60 kg P2O5 fed−1 and NCaP at 10%, 20% and 30% from the recommended dose were applied to the soil. Foliar application involved both monoammonium phosphate (MAP) at one rate of 2.5 g L−1 and NCaP at 5% and 10% from the MAP rate. The results of all experiments showed that NCaP significantly increased the shoot and root dry weights, the nutrient content in the shoot and root, the yield components, the nutrient concentration and crude protein percentage in pods of the snap bean plants compared with traditional P. The greatest increase was obtained from a 20% NCaP soil application in combination with a 5% NCaP foliar application. The present study recommends using NCaP as an alternative source of P to mitigate the negative effects of traditional sources.

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers On The Nutrient (N P And K) Content Of Snap Bean Plantssupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Effect Of Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers On The Nutrient (N P And K) Content Of Snap Bean Plantssupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Effect Of Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers On The Nutrient (N P And K) Content Of Snap Bean Plantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The pH of the solution surrounding is moderately acidic, making MAP an especially desirable fertilizer in alkaline soil. In addition, the nitrogen in the ammonium form (NH 4+ ) in MAP, which resists leaching and a slower release form of nitrogen (Youssef et al, 2017). As well as improves root activity and biological processes in the root zone which reflects on soil pH value that declines as activity increases.…”

Section: Performance At Period Of 120 Days (Harvest Stage)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved Efficiency of P Fertilization with Bio and Organic additives on Growth, Seed Quality and Soybean Yield

El-Mahdy

Anwar

2020

Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two field experiments were conducted at Experimental Farm of Tag El-Ezz, Agricultural Research Station, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt, during two successive summer seasons of 2019 and 2020 to study the improving efficiency of different P mineral sources with bio, and organic additives as combined treatments on growth performance, quantitative and qualitative productivity of soybean plants (Glycine max L., cv. Giza 111). A split-plot design with three replicates was used, representing three sources of P fertilizers (control, Ordinary superphosphate OSP, and Mono ammonium phosphate MAP as the main plots, six bio and organic treatments (control, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi AM, vermicompost V, potassium humate KH, AM+V, and AM+KH as the subplots. The results were collected briefly as follows: MAP gave the highest values of vegetative growth, yield, its components, and seed quality compared to (OSP) or control. AM+KH had the best-aforementioned adjectives compared to other bio and organic additives, where the plants fertilized with AM+V came in the second-order followed by KH then V, and lately AM alone. The combination of MAP and AM+KH was the superior treatment effect on all studied traits compared to the other treatments, the highest P use efficiencies values and (benefit: cost) ratio were achieved from this reaction. The available N, P, K and pH value of soil after the harvest of soybean were improved significantly due to the integration of inorganic fertilizers with bio and organic fertilizers.

show abstract

“…The increase in total biomass in the bean plant is possibly due to the effects of the fungus on increasing water absorption, improving the structure of the substrate, and the absorption of various nutrients as reported for various types of legumes including P. vulgaris L, as described by Youssef and colleagues. 43 Colonization of Mycorrhizal Fungi. The root system of the plants was examined to identify the typical structures of AMF (Figure 4) and determine the effect of the infective capacity of AMF according to the treatment of the seeds.…”

Section: ■ Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nanofibers as a Delivery System for Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi

Campaña

Arias

2020

ACS Appl. Polym. Mater.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are beneficial symbiotic organisms that play an important role in the water absorption and nutrient assimilation for a wide variety of plants. In this work, the use of polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanofibers was studied as a delivery system for AMF through the coated nanofibers of common bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris L var. José Beta). Thus, the effect of PEO nanofibers on the infective capacity of AMF and the indicator parameters of plant growth promotion (height plant, root length, number of leaves, number of flower buds, number of pods, fresh weight, and dry weight) was examined. Likewise, the mycorrhizal colonization rate and the indicator parameters of plant growth promotion between a conventional inoculation strategy and inoculation by nanofiber-coated seeds were compared. The results show that PEO nanofibers did not have any negative effect on the infective capacity of AMF or the indicator parameters of plant growth promotion. On the other hand, the inoculated bean plants showed a significant increase of 200, 140, and 143% in the number of flower buds, fresh weight, and dry weight, respectively. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in the mycorrhizal colonization rate between the two inoculation strategies used, even though the inoculant dose was 97% lower for the nanofiber-coated seeds. Therefore, nanofibers could represent a promising alternative as a seed-coating material and for the development of easy-to-apply and economically viable technologies for the application of AMF inoculants in the fields of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, ecological remediation, and related areas.

show abstract

Effect of Phosphorus Sources and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Growth and Productivity of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Cited by 13 publications

References 35 publications

Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants

Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants

Improved Efficiency of P Fertilization with Bio and Organic additives on Growth, Seed Quality and Soybean Yield

Nanofibers as a Delivery System for Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About