1991
DOI: 10.2527/1991.6941370x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pig weaning weight and associated nursery feeding programs on subsequent performance to 105 kilograms body weight.

Abstract: An experiment using a total of 210 crossbred pigs from two farrowing groups evaluated the effects of three weaning weights and their associative starter feeding program on subsequent postweaning performance to 105 kg BW. One group of pigs nursed their dams in outside heated hutches (Trial 1), and a second group was raised in a centrally heated farrowing house (Trial II). The three pig weaning weight groups ranged in weight from 1) 4.1 to 5.0 kg, 2) 5.5 to 6.8 kg, and 3) 7.3 to 8.6 kg. Pigs in Group 1 were fed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
60
3
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
60
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Mahan and Lepine (1991) showed that pigs weighing from 7.3 to 8.6 kg at weaning (25.3 days old) reached a weight of 105 kg approximately 15 days earlier than pigs that weighed from 4.1 to 5 kg at weaning at 23.8 days, regardless of the lighter group being fed a higher quality starter diet than that offered to the heavier pigs. Miller et al (1999) demonstrated that the weaning weight of pigs in the 1st week after weaning was a significant predicator of subsequent performance, but Slade and Miller (1999) added that the significance of this factor reduced with time post-weaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mahan and Lepine (1991) showed that pigs weighing from 7.3 to 8.6 kg at weaning (25.3 days old) reached a weight of 105 kg approximately 15 days earlier than pigs that weighed from 4.1 to 5 kg at weaning at 23.8 days, regardless of the lighter group being fed a higher quality starter diet than that offered to the heavier pigs. Miller et al (1999) demonstrated that the weaning weight of pigs in the 1st week after weaning was a significant predicator of subsequent performance, but Slade and Miller (1999) added that the significance of this factor reduced with time post-weaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3PS) and the maximum was 23.74kg (1PS), with a variation of 2.05kg. Variations in age and weight at the beginning of the growing and finishing phases are determined by several factors such as weaning weight and nutrition program (MAHAN & LEPINE, 1991). These factors are difficult to control (TOKACH et al, 2007) and are accepted as a natural component of the process or disregarded due to their complexity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neonatal pigs of an average litter birth weight but with the highest circulating concentrations of AGP will grow more slowly than littermates of similar birth weight [2] and have a different body composition after weaning [4]. Previous research has demonstrated that pigs that grow poorly to weaning will not recover and will reach mature weight later than littermates [5] [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%