2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of platelet-rich fibrin on alveolar ridge preservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of PRF (with or without additional bone grafting material, such as deproteinized bovine bone mineral, DBBM) for ridge preservation has been reported previously. However, its efficacy has been evaluated with heterogeneous approaches, and results are inconsistent (Castro et al, ; Pan et al, ; Temmerman et al, ). Interestingly, it was observed that some patients have smaller and/or shorter PRF membranes than others (Mazzocca et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of PRF (with or without additional bone grafting material, such as deproteinized bovine bone mineral, DBBM) for ridge preservation has been reported previously. However, its efficacy has been evaluated with heterogeneous approaches, and results are inconsistent (Castro et al, ; Pan et al, ; Temmerman et al, ). Interestingly, it was observed that some patients have smaller and/or shorter PRF membranes than others (Mazzocca et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of a systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that PRF use may improve alveolar ridge preservation and bone fill in extraction sockets. However, the current evidence is insufficient to conclude the benefit of PRF in bone regeneration 23 . Another meta-analysis of twelve studies reveals that PRF addition to open flap debridement improves soft and hard tissue healing as determined by the amount of gingival margin change and bone fill in intrabony defects 24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results of the clinical measurements of the closing of the wound by secondary intention with a periodontal probe 16,24,32 are similar to those demonstrated in our report, with a clear distinction in the type of teeth measured, such as premolars, 15,16,28 incisors, canines, 10,14,24 or lower third molars. 32 Recent systematic reviews 23,33,34 are inconclusive as to the effect of PRF on soft tissue healing. These results may be due to both teeth having been treated surgically in a similar way, after an atraumatic technique and preservation of the gingiva with sutures, preventing their Measurement with periapical radiographs to evaluate changes of the alveolar bone after tooth extraction has been previously used and validated by several studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Recent systematic reviews have reported that L-PRF does not offer greater benefits in bone formation compared with a blood clot, 12,20 and others have been inconclusive in terms of the effectiveness of L-PRF given the great heterogeneity of the reports, lack of control for risk of bias, and information about the clinical trials. [21][22][23] To date, ARP has been analyzed by measuring wound healing, with periapical radiographs or a dental cast. 24 A volumetric analysis using computer-aided design/ and computer-aided manufacturing technology or with the overlapping of images as in Standard Tessellation Language (.stl) could contribute to the volumetric measurement in ARP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%