1960
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-103-25477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Pluronic F68 on Growth of Fibroblasts in Suspension on Rotary Shaker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PF-68, an amphiphilic triblock copolymer consisting of poly(propylene oxide) center and two poly(ethylene oxide) tails, has been the primary additive used industrially to protect cells from damage. It should be added that the original selection of PF-68 was an empirical process (Swim and Parker 1960). A number of mechanisms for the protective effects of PF-68 have been proposed which can be categorized into two groups: biological and physical.…”
Section: Cell Damage From Spargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PF-68, an amphiphilic triblock copolymer consisting of poly(propylene oxide) center and two poly(ethylene oxide) tails, has been the primary additive used industrially to protect cells from damage. It should be added that the original selection of PF-68 was an empirical process (Swim and Parker 1960). A number of mechanisms for the protective effects of PF-68 have been proposed which can be categorized into two groups: biological and physical.…”
Section: Cell Damage From Spargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addition of the nonionic block copolymer Pluronic F-68 to the culture medium has been shown to protect mammalian cells (Kilburn and Webb, 1968;Handa et al, 1987;Handa-Corrigan et al, 1989;Passini and Goochee, 1989;Reuveny et al, 1986;Radlett et al, 1971) and insect cells (Murhammer andGoochee, 1988, 1990;Maiorella et al, 1988) from the detrimental effects of sparging. Pluronic F-68, which has a total average molecular weight of 8400, consists of a center block of poly(oxypropy1ene) (20 ?6 by weight) and blocks of poly(oxyethy1ene) at both ends (Stanton, 1957;Swim and Parker, 1960;Schmolka, 1972Schmolka, ,1977. The specific mechanism of Pluronic F-68 protection is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite studying a significant number of compounds, these studies still show that Pluronic F-68 (PF-68), which was one of the first protective additivies advocated, remains the most effective (Kilburn and Webb, 1968;Runyan and Geyer, 1963;Swim and Parker, 1960). However, as was also demonstrated by Ma et al (2004), as the cell density increases, the effectiveness of PF-68 decreases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%