2011
DOI: 10.4314/ijest.v3i2.68134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of point source and heterogeneity on the propagation of magnetoelastic shear wave in a monoclinic medium

Abstract: This paper stands to investigate the possibility of propagation of SH waves due to a point source in a magnetoelastic monoclinic layer lying over a heterogeneous monoclinic half-space. The heterogeneity is caused by consideration of quadratic variation in rigidity. The methodology employed combines an efficient derivation for Green's functions based on algebraic transformations with the perturbation approach. Dispersion equation has been obtained in the closed form. The dispersion curves are compared for diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Green’s function is defined depending on the characteristics of the material medium about how it reacts mechanically to an impulsive excitation force. Chattopadhyay and Singh (2011) investigates the possibility of SH-wave propagation due to a point source in a magnetoelastic monoclinic layer overlying a monoclinic half-space with the aid of Green’s function. Some more disquisition on this ground may be referred from Chattopadhyay et al (2012) and Chattopadhyay and Kar (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green’s function is defined depending on the characteristics of the material medium about how it reacts mechanically to an impulsive excitation force. Chattopadhyay and Singh (2011) investigates the possibility of SH-wave propagation due to a point source in a magnetoelastic monoclinic layer overlying a monoclinic half-space with the aid of Green’s function. Some more disquisition on this ground may be referred from Chattopadhyay et al (2012) and Chattopadhyay and Kar (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%