1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199603)21:3<167::aid-ppul3>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of positioning on pulmonary function of newborns: Comparison of supine and prone position

Abstract: The effect of positioning on pulmonary function has been previously evaluated, and the prone position has been reported to be preferable for neonates with various respiratory diseases. Studies in healthy neonates have yielded conflicting results. Using a crying pulmonary function test, we examined the effect of positioning on pulmonary function in healthy full‐term neonates. Thirty‐nine infants with a mean birthweight (± SD) of 3,140 ± 379 g and a mean gestational age (± SD) of 39.8 ± 1.6 weeks were investigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative explanation is that the infant's ability to respond to the stimulus was impaired in the prone position, consistent with our finding of lower MIOP in the prone compared to the supine position. It is possible that head position might affect the MIOP results, as head turning can result in deformation of the airways, 10 but we have previously demonstrated the supine posture, regardless of head position, was associated with a significantly higher respiratory muscle strength than the prone posture 7 and in this study took particular care to control the neck position and avoid flexion. A lower MIOP may not reflect lower respiratory muscle strength if there is chest wall distortion, as under such conditions increased diaphragmatic activity may not transmit an increased occlusion pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…An alternative explanation is that the infant's ability to respond to the stimulus was impaired in the prone position, consistent with our finding of lower MIOP in the prone compared to the supine position. It is possible that head position might affect the MIOP results, as head turning can result in deformation of the airways, 10 but we have previously demonstrated the supine posture, regardless of head position, was associated with a significantly higher respiratory muscle strength than the prone posture 7 and in this study took particular care to control the neck position and avoid flexion. A lower MIOP may not reflect lower respiratory muscle strength if there is chest wall distortion, as under such conditions increased diaphragmatic activity may not transmit an increased occlusion pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, head turning results in deformation of the airways. 19 A second study was therefore performed in which each infant was assessed in both the supine and prone posture with the head to the right, as well as in the supine posture with the head to the midline. The supine posture, regardless of head position, was associated with a significantly higher PIMAX than the prone posture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of risk factors cannot be ignored within specific populations of infants but reports suggest that some 80% of SIDS babies are born full term and of normal birth weight ( Department of Health 1993). Advice to this group of infants is supported by the results of a recent study of healthy neonates by Shen et al . (1996 ), which suggests that the supine position is optimum for ventilation in the healthy term infant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%