“…The first question was: “How effective is MET compared to other available therapies in non-specific acute or chronic neck pain?” For convenience, the studies were analyzed by dividing them into two subgroups, one treating acute non-specific neck pain and the other chronic neck pain, respectively. All the studies analyzed show an effective improvement in the outcomes of pain, disability and joint function, which leads us to say that MET is certainly an effective and safe technique in the treatment of cervical pain [ 35 , 40 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]. However, the results for the two subgroups were different: as regards neck pain in the acute phase, a significant improvement was recorded in all three outcomes, superior to or comparable to the other methods with which it was compared [ 35 , 40 , 47 , 48 , 55 ]; in the chronic phase neck pain there was greater attention in relation to joint function, the only parameter significantly higher than the other comparison methods [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ].…”