2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pre-oxidation on low pressure membrane (LPM) for water and wastewater treatment: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For pH 11, zeta potential of HS was decreased to −41.3 and −42.4 mV due to H 2 O 2 and NaClO treatment, respectively. Because the membrane used in this study was negatively charged (−15.9 ± 0.3 mV in 1 mM KCl solution at pH 7), the decrease of zeta potential, i.e., the increase of negative charge, would enhance electrostatic repulsion and weaken the adhesion force between HS and the membrane [2]. Therefore, the higher cleaning efficacy of H 2 O 2 at pH 11 can be partly attributed to the more significant decrease of zeta potential caused by H 2 O 2 treatment at pH 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For pH 11, zeta potential of HS was decreased to −41.3 and −42.4 mV due to H 2 O 2 and NaClO treatment, respectively. Because the membrane used in this study was negatively charged (−15.9 ± 0.3 mV in 1 mM KCl solution at pH 7), the decrease of zeta potential, i.e., the increase of negative charge, would enhance electrostatic repulsion and weaken the adhesion force between HS and the membrane [2]. Therefore, the higher cleaning efficacy of H 2 O 2 at pH 11 can be partly attributed to the more significant decrease of zeta potential caused by H 2 O 2 treatment at pH 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, the application of ultrafiltration (UF) in water industry has increased rapidly because of its small footprint and efficient and reliable removal towards particles and pathogens [1,2]. Nevertheless, membrane fouling, i.e., the decrease of membrane permeability due to accumulation of organic/inorganic/biological substances on/within membrane, is one of the major bottlenecks of UF technology [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mn in drinking water has also been linked to neurotoxic effects in children [13,14] and might affect the health of consumers [15][16][17]. At present, the general methods to remove NH 4 + during drinking water treatment are adsorption [18], chemical oxidation [19][20][21], biofiltration processes [22], and membrane separation technology [23]. Meanwhile, many treatment options have been explored for Mn 2+ removal, which include chemical oxidation [1] and biological processes [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its wide application is restricted by membrane fouling, which is an inherent drawback of membrane technology [3]. Although membrane fouling can be alleviated by several strategies, such as development of anti-fouling membrane, pretreatment of feed water, and optimization of operation parameters, physically irreversible fouling is still inevitable during long-term operation [4]. Therefore, chemical cleaning is indispensable for the sustainable running of UF system [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%