1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00550-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Precipitated Withdrawal on Extracellular Glutamate and Aspartate in the Nucleus Accumbens of Chronically Morphine-Treated Rats: An In Vivo Microdialysis Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have assessed various classical somatic and autonomic signs of withdrawal, as well as biochemical markers (Bristow et al, 1997;Rasmussen, 1995). Ability of NMDA receptor antagonists to block the expression of opioid withdrawal is consistent with the frequently reported increase in glutamate release in opioid-withdrawn animals (Sepulveda et al, 1998) and facilitation of the withdrawal signs by glutamate receptor agonist administration (Tokuyama et al, 1996). Similarly, stimulation of mGluRII receptors with (+)-2-aminobicyclo [3,1,0] hexane-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (LY354740) was shown to inhibit the expression of morphine dependence (Klodzinska et al, 1999;Vandergriff and Rasmussen, 1999).…”
Section: Effects Of Gcp II Inhibition On Morphine Dependence/ Withdrawalsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies have assessed various classical somatic and autonomic signs of withdrawal, as well as biochemical markers (Bristow et al, 1997;Rasmussen, 1995). Ability of NMDA receptor antagonists to block the expression of opioid withdrawal is consistent with the frequently reported increase in glutamate release in opioid-withdrawn animals (Sepulveda et al, 1998) and facilitation of the withdrawal signs by glutamate receptor agonist administration (Tokuyama et al, 1996). Similarly, stimulation of mGluRII receptors with (+)-2-aminobicyclo [3,1,0] hexane-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (LY354740) was shown to inhibit the expression of morphine dependence (Klodzinska et al, 1999;Vandergriff and Rasmussen, 1999).…”
Section: Effects Of Gcp II Inhibition On Morphine Dependence/ Withdrawalsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…If this hypothesis were correct, it could be speculated that administration of a high dose (100 mg/kg) of 2-PMPA leads to high concentrations of NAAG that acts as an agonist, rather than an antagonist at NMDA receptors, and thus increases the severity of morphine withdrawal. In support, it should be noted that during opioid withdrawal there is a massive release of glutamate (Rasmussen, 1995;Jhamandas et al, 1996;Sepulveda et al, 1998). The effects of massive glutamate release apparently may not be prevented by NAAG-induced mGluRII stimulation and/or a decrease in glutamate release.…”
Section: Effects Of Gcp II Inhibition On Morphine Dependence/ Withdrawalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both PKA and glutamate-mediated increases in Ca 2ϩ are necessary for CREB activation, but only PKA can induce GluR1 phosphorylation at Ser 845 (Sheng et al, 1991;Chao et al, 2002a). Thus, naloxone-induced P-CREB in morphine-dependent rats might reflect synergism between signaling from withdrawal-induced glutamate release (Sepulveda et al, 1998) and increased cAMP. Other studies have shown that low doses of naloxone induce c-fos and Fos-related antigens (FRAs) in the NAc of morphinedependent rats (Walters et al, 2000;Gracy et al, 2001).…”
Section: Dissociation Of Motivational and Somatic Withdrawal Signsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SKF 82958 increased P-GluR1 selectively in the NAc of morphine-dependent rats, but the D 1 receptor-mediated increase in P-GluR1 was significantly reduced in dependent rats treated with naloxone. P-GluR1 is rapidly dephosphorylated during AMPA receptor activation in the NAc (Snyder et al, 2003); because glutamate release is increased in the NAc during morphine withdrawal (Sepulveda et al, 1998), a concomitant increase in AMPA receptor activation and GluR1 dephosphorylation would be expected. It is thus possible that the rewarding effects of SKF 82958 observed in morphine-dependent rats and those treated with naloxone are mediated in different brain regions.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of D 1 Agonist Effects In Morphine-dependent Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a substantial amount of literature suggesting that opiates interact with glutamatergic transmission (Gass & Olive, 2008). Most in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that morphine suppresses both basal and evoked increases in extracellular glutamate in NAc and other regions (Sepulveda, Hernandez, Rada, Tucci, & Contreras, 1998). Morphine can also act postsynaptically to suppress glutamate-evoked neuronal excitation (Giacchino & Henriksen, 1998).…”
Section: T a B L Ementioning
confidence: 99%