2021
DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Presence of Ramus Intermedius Artery on Location of Culprit Lesions in Acute Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of LCX proximal segment plaques in this study was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) when compared between and within groups, which is consistent with the findings of El Zayat, Rosani, El Zayat [ 18 ]suggested that it was due to low longitudinal strain in LCX. In contrast to the results of the Rosani study, there was no statistical difference between the LM plaque groups in this study, which we believe may be equally influenced by the inconsistent risk factors included in both studies and needs to be further investigated in depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The incidence of LCX proximal segment plaques in this study was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) when compared between and within groups, which is consistent with the findings of El Zayat, Rosani, El Zayat [ 18 ]suggested that it was due to low longitudinal strain in LCX. In contrast to the results of the Rosani study, there was no statistical difference between the LM plaque groups in this study, which we believe may be equally influenced by the inconsistent risk factors included in both studies and needs to be further investigated in depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Another review highlighted the association between RI and larger anterior infarctions as well as more proximal LAD lesions [ 20 ]. Notably, this association was not observed in the case of the LCX, as the presence of RI was not associated with more proximal LCX lesions [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%