2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of preservative solutions on preservation of Calliphora augur and Lucilia cuprina larvae (Diptera: Calliphoridae) with implications for post-mortem interval estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specimens were processed quickly and the ethanol in all vials was topped up when necessary in an attempt to minimise any detrimental effect of handling specimens during preservation [7]. The variation between persons recording this data was assessed prior to the experiment and was concluded to be negligible (results not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specimens were processed quickly and the ethanol in all vials was topped up when necessary in an attempt to minimise any detrimental effect of handling specimens during preservation [7]. The variation between persons recording this data was assessed prior to the experiment and was concluded to be negligible (results not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Day and Wallman [7] provided the most recent study to investigate the effects of preservation on the change in blowfly larval length. One of their experiments, relevant to this study, tested the effects of preservation on the change in length in 80% ethanol of first, second, feeding third and post-feeding third instar larvae of Calliphora augur over a 10-day period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardised larval killing and preservation methods were employed throughout this study, which allowed direct comparisons of larval lengths for each species, temperature, and time point. However, the killing and preservation method used has important implications for PMI estimation, given that different protocols have been shown to affect the measurable larval length (Tantawi & Greenberg, 1993; Day & Wallman, 2008). For the purposes of PMI estimation, it is therefore important that larvae be killed and preserved by the same method as those from which developmental growth curves were generated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful dissection of the feeding substrate ensured all larvae were recovered from the mince. Larvae were killed by immersion in just‐boiled water, dried with paper towel, and preserved in 80% EtOH (Byrd & Castner, 2001; Day & Wallman, 2008). Larval lengths were measured to the nearest 0.1 μm using a Leica MZ7 5 dissecting microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and Motic Images Plus 2.0 ML software (Motic China Group Company, Xiamen, China).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forensic practice, it includes the method of killing and preserving the larvae that could cause a significant underestimation in the age values of the larvae (Tantawi and Greenberg 1993;Adams and Hall 2003), and thus, resulting inaccuracies in PMI min calculations. Moreover, handling of preservatives could also alter the conditions of larval specimens, such as colour changes and degradation of specimens' quality (Day and Wallman 2008;Rosilawati et al 2014). This also includes storage periods in preservatives that affected larval body length and weight (Midgley and Villet 2009;Richards et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%