1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.39.3178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pressure on the optical absorption in GaP andGaxIn1et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
19
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…45 This is actually what is observed in the inset of Fig. 4, where the energy of the PL peak maximum as a function of pressure is depicted (red circle points) and matches well with a pressure coefficient of À13 meV.GPa material.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…45 This is actually what is observed in the inset of Fig. 4, where the energy of the PL peak maximum as a function of pressure is depicted (red circle points) and matches well with a pressure coefficient of À13 meV.GPa material.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…. ,E 4 transition energies, which are much smaller than −13 meV GPa −1 , the value measured for bulk GaP [60]. The situation is completely similar to that found for the InP/GaP QD system [46], where a similar reduction was observed.…”
Section: B Effect Of the Hydrostatic Pressuresupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Hence, the observed redshift unambiguously proves that the PL peak involves X-type conduction states in good correlation with TB calculations. This was already discussed in detail in a previous work [35], in which it was noticed that the measured linear variation roughly corresponds to the expected pressure dependence for an X-like level in GaP (−13 meV GPa −1 : the measured pressure coefficient of the indirect X-bandgap in bulk GaP [60]). …”
Section: B Effect Of the Hydrostatic Pressurementioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 as a function of pressure. Whereas the emission from the wetting layer shifts to lower energies at the rate of À13.9(5) meV/GPa typical for the G-X indirect gap of GaP [14], the QD line displays a much smaller pressure coefficient of À4.4(5) meV/GPa. The pressure dependence of the PL peak intensity of the dots is depicted in the inset to Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%