2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2019.109887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of progesterone on the vaccination and immune response against Chlamydia abortus in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some authors have shown that progesterone pre-treatment facilitated chlamydial multiplication and dissemination in mice ( [28]), but another study using guinea pigs as hosts showed that, it was the oestradiol pre-treatment that produced longer infections, with greater dissemination and pathology ( [29]). In the case of C. abortus, a previous study of experimental vaccination in the natural host, progesterone was shown to have a role enhancing a protective immune response after immunisation with the same experimental vaccine used in this study ( [19]). However, in the present study we have described that, in mice, progesterone treatment exerted no positive or detrimental effect on the development of protective response induced by vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, some authors have shown that progesterone pre-treatment facilitated chlamydial multiplication and dissemination in mice ( [28]), but another study using guinea pigs as hosts showed that, it was the oestradiol pre-treatment that produced longer infections, with greater dissemination and pathology ( [29]). In the case of C. abortus, a previous study of experimental vaccination in the natural host, progesterone was shown to have a role enhancing a protective immune response after immunisation with the same experimental vaccine used in this study ( [19]). However, in the present study we have described that, in mice, progesterone treatment exerted no positive or detrimental effect on the development of protective response induced by vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore, while the role of sex hormones on the immune system is well established, the knowledge about the specific role of oestradiol and progesterone during C. abortus infection and on protection conferred by vaccination remains scarce. Interestingly, our group has recently reported that, in an experimental C. abortus vaccination of sheep, progesterone treatment induced recruitment of Treg cells into inflammatory tissue, but did not affect either the humoral response or the cell-mediated immunity induced by immunisation [19]. To deepen the understanding of these effects, in the present study we have used an ovariectomised mouse model treated with oestradiol and progesterone to study the effect of sex hormones in the pathogenesis of C. abortus infection, and also their impact on the effectiveness of vaccination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, experiment 1 shows the results of the INMEVA vaccine comparing them with the efficacy results obtained with an experimental inactivated vaccine widely used in different studies (i.e., the UMU vaccine). This UMU vaccine was previously tested on murine and ovine models, both with systemic ( 28 , 36 ) and local ( 39 41 ) challenge, showing exceptionally good protective results in all cases. In these studies, the strain used to conduct these challenges was the same strain used to develop the UMU vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%