1988
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.113.3.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Pruning System on Yield Components of Two Summer-bearing Raspberry Cultivars

Abstract: Effects of annual pruning, alternate-year mowing, and primocane suppression on yield and its components for ‘Titan’ and ‘Royalty’ summer-bearing raspberries (Rubus idaeus and R. neglectus) were measured for 2 consecutive years. Cumulative yield was highest for primocane suppression and lowest for alternate-year mowing. Path analysis revealed that cane number per plant and number of fruitful laterals per cane were the most important yield components for both cultivars. Alternate-year mowing plots had higher can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crandall et al (3) demonstrated that although there was a positive relationship between cane vigor and fruit number, this only partially accounted for variation in yield. Nehrbas and Pritts (17) found that, with summer-bearing raspberries, cane number always had the strongest direct effect on yield and negative effects on all other yield components, especially fruit size. Further, fruit number per node did not have a strong direct effect on yield and cane thinning had a large, direct impact on yield through effects on number of fruiting nodes and fruit size (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crandall et al (3) demonstrated that although there was a positive relationship between cane vigor and fruit number, this only partially accounted for variation in yield. Nehrbas and Pritts (17) found that, with summer-bearing raspberries, cane number always had the strongest direct effect on yield and negative effects on all other yield components, especially fruit size. Further, fruit number per node did not have a strong direct effect on yield and cane thinning had a large, direct impact on yield through effects on number of fruiting nodes and fruit size (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nehrbas and Pritts (17) found that, with summer-bearing raspberries, cane number always had the strongest direct effect on yield and negative effects on all other yield components, especially fruit size. Further, fruit number per node did not have a strong direct effect on yield and cane thinning had a large, direct impact on yield through effects on number of fruiting nodes and fruit size (17). Our results with primocanefruiting cultivars, as based on component analysis, indicated that retaining all primocanes should have a positive effect on yield without affecting fruit size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent studies worldwide have focused on the effect of polyethylene biodegradable plastic mulch (Zhang et al, 2019), spotted wing drosophila (DiGiacomo et al, 2019), phytochemicals (Frias-Moreno et al, 2019), reduced nitrogen fertilizer rates (Lu et al, 2022), pruning practices (Nehrbas and Pritts, 1988;Gundersheim and Pritts, 1991) and yield components (Hoover et al, 1988;Freeman et al, 1989;Kantarbayeva et al, 2017) on the productivity of crops. Remontant raspberry is a group of raspberry varieties characterized by the ability to bear fruit on annual shoots (Kazakov et al, 2007;Pantsyreva et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%