2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of PTFE nanoparticles in catalyst layer with high Pt loading on PEM fuel cell performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PEMFC membrane electrode assembly (MEA) performance significantly depends on not only on the activity and EASA of the catalysts, but also on the catalytic layer structure and thickness. For instance, a thinner catalytic layer (with a higher Pt content) provides a better mass transfer and lower charge transfer resistance within the active layer [42][43][44]. Layers with a Pt content gradient structure have also been proposed [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PEMFC membrane electrode assembly (MEA) performance significantly depends on not only on the activity and EASA of the catalysts, but also on the catalytic layer structure and thickness. For instance, a thinner catalytic layer (with a higher Pt content) provides a better mass transfer and lower charge transfer resistance within the active layer [42][43][44]. Layers with a Pt content gradient structure have also been proposed [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the results obtained with the catalyst solution containing the FEP polymer supported the results obtained for the PTFE polymer. However, they suggested that FEP may be more advantageous due to higher hydrophilic properties than PTFE nanoparticles . Ozturk et al prepared the MPL layer of the fuel cell using two different molecular weight polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (PDMS‐1, 236.53 g/mol) and PDMS (PDMS‐2, 117.000 g/mol), PTFE, and FEP as hydrophobic polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they suggested that FEP may be more advantageous due to higher hydrophilic properties than PTFE nanoparticles. 11,12 Ozturk et al prepared the MPL layer of the fuel cell using two different molecular weight polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (PDMS-1, 236.53 g/mol) and PDMS (PDMS-2, 117.000 g/mol), PTFE, and FEP as hydrophobic polymers. The performance of the cells including the FEP polymer was not satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avcioglu et al reported that the cell performance they obtained by adding 5, 10, 20, and 30 wt.% PTFE was 76, 64, 35, and 33 mA/cm 2 , respectively. They argued that as the PTFE amount increased, the Pt and carbon structures were isolated by PTFE nanoparticles, thereby reducing Pt use and decreasing performance [43]. Performance tests for different humidification temperatures showed that the MEAs prepared were unsuitable for the operation at 50 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%