2016
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1194963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results

Abstract: Investigating the impact of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency is becoming a critical issue in applied agricultural policy analysis. This article presents a meta-analysis of empirical results on this issue, based on data gathered from a systematic literature review. We find that, in the empirical literature, subsidies are commonly negatively associated with farm technical efficiency. Meta-regression estimation results show that the direction (significantly negative, significantly positive or non-sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
170
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
22
170
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the CATS data include details on all 17 Other studies relating agricultural productivity (efficiency) to this subsidy rate are, for example, Fogarasi and Latruffe (2009) and Bakucs, Latruffe, Fertő, and Fogarasi (2010). See Minviel and Latruffe (2017) for an overview. 18 The CATS was created to assist the European Commission in implementing audits on agricultural expenditures.…”
Section: Agricultural Subsidy Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, the CATS data include details on all 17 Other studies relating agricultural productivity (efficiency) to this subsidy rate are, for example, Fogarasi and Latruffe (2009) and Bakucs, Latruffe, Fertő, and Fogarasi (2010). See Minviel and Latruffe (2017) for an overview. 18 The CATS was created to assist the European Commission in implementing audits on agricultural expenditures.…”
Section: Agricultural Subsidy Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsidies may enhance agricultural productivity in the presence of imperfections in credit or insurance markets (e.g., Ciaian & Swinnen, 2009;Hennessy, 1998;Roche & McQuinn, 2004). A recent review concludes that some studies find positive, other negative effects, and some find no effect of subsidies on agricultural productivity (Minviel & Latruffe, 2017). These different findings may be due to variations in rural market imperfections or to differences in the nature of the subsidies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that highly subsidized farms have an inefficient behavior in the sense that they use energy resources more in excess than farms that are low subsidized. The literature on the effect of subsidies on farms' technical efficiency is relatively vast, e.g., see Zhu et al [42] and a recent meta-analysis by Minviel and Latruffe [43]. Existing studies generally find that subsidies negatively impact farms' technical efficiency.…”
Section: Determinants Of Slacks Of Intermediate Consumption and Energmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support schemes prevail in agriculture across many countries—for example, the common agricultural policy (CAP) in the European Union (EU)—because of the multifunctionality of agriculture. Among multiple support measures, those related to investments are linked to changes in capital assets and modernization in general (Minviel & Latruffe, ). Thus, it is important to identify the effects of support policies on the underlying technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%