2022
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pulmonary vein cryoballoon ablation in dogs with coolant-nitrogen

Abstract: Background: The Arctic Front Advance System with nitrous oxide (N 2 O) refrigerant is the leading system for the cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). A novel cryoablation system with nitrogen (N 2 ) refrigerant was developed with technical improvements seeking to improve outcomes. Cryoballoon ablation with the N 2 refrigerant may be effective and safe for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).Methods: In total, 16 dogs were included in the study, of which 13 underwent PVI procedures, and 3 served as base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other concern is that the liquid nitrogen CBA catheter has a more rapid freezing effect, where temperature drops 3.07 °C per second, compared with 1.59 °C per second with nitrous oxide CBA catheters). 7 Although more rapid freezing effect might be more effective in achieving PVI, the temperature could possibly be more unstable and uncontrollable, which might increase the potential safety risks. The different physical properties suggest that using the liquid nitrogen as a cryogen requires a more considered and sophisticated design and manufacture of the CBA system, and more intense safety monitoring during and after the CBA procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The other concern is that the liquid nitrogen CBA catheter has a more rapid freezing effect, where temperature drops 3.07 °C per second, compared with 1.59 °C per second with nitrous oxide CBA catheters). 7 Although more rapid freezing effect might be more effective in achieving PVI, the temperature could possibly be more unstable and uncontrollable, which might increase the potential safety risks. The different physical properties suggest that using the liquid nitrogen as a cryogen requires a more considered and sophisticated design and manufacture of the CBA system, and more intense safety monitoring during and after the CBA procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 , 25 Further research is warranted to testify the efficacy of this liquid nitrogen CBA system for various types of AF. Furthermore, because previous published literature 20 , 26 and results from animal experiment of the liquid nitrogen CBA system 7 showed the incidence of severe esophageal injury is relatively low, esophageal injury was monitored and evaluated only by observing the gastrointestinal symptoms and signs during and after the procedure. However, we acknowledge that that might not be sufficient to comprehensively evaluate esophageal injury, and therefore the incidence of esophageal injury might be underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a liquid nitrogen-based CBA system (Cryofocus Medtech) has been developed for treating atrial fibrillation. 6 Unlike CBA systems using nitrous oxide, which primarily rely on the Joule-Thomson effect for freezing, liquid nitrogen CBA primarily achieves tissue freezing through vaporization. To facilitate this process, liquid nitrogen CBA is equipped with as many as 18 refrigerant release channels to ensure a uniform release of liquid nitrogen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An animal experiment was conducted preliminarily using liquid nitrogen CBA to assess its feasibility, safety, and effectiveness for the PVI. 6 In total, 13 dogs underwent PVI: 8 dogs received treatment with liquid nitrogen CBA and 5 dogs received treatment with AFA. The PVI success rate following a single ablation was higher in the liquid nitrogen CBA group compared with the AFA group (92.9% vs 60.0%; P = 0.05), although the time to isolation was similar between the groups (48.1 ± 29.1 seconds vs 52.3 ± 51.2 seconds).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%