1994
DOI: 10.1016/0955-5986(94)90030-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pulsating flow on Coriolis mass flowmeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The foregoing conclusions regarding the behaviour of a Coriolis meter in a pulsatile flow can be compared to the experimental results reported by Vetter & Notzon (1994). Unfortunately, there is no mention in their paper of the method which is used to determine the phase difference in their test meter, nor is there any report of the characteristics of the raw detector signals.…”
Section: Pulsating Flow Through a Coriolis Metermentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The foregoing conclusions regarding the behaviour of a Coriolis meter in a pulsatile flow can be compared to the experimental results reported by Vetter & Notzon (1994). Unfortunately, there is no mention in their paper of the method which is used to determine the phase difference in their test meter, nor is there any report of the characteristics of the raw detector signals.…”
Section: Pulsating Flow Through a Coriolis Metermentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is no indication in the work of Vetter & Notzon (1994) that they were aware of the possibility of a resonance being excited by a fluid pulsation at double the frequency, and it must be noted that there is no indication on their figure 2 of such an effect at 155 Hz, where it might have been expected. It is not clear whether this is due to geometric differences between a straight tube meter and a U-tube meter, or to coarse spacing of excitation frequencies.…”
Section: Flow Through An Undriven Coriolis Metermentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vetter and Notzon (1994) reported the results of experiments involving two di!erent U-tube meters subjected to pulsations from a piston pulsator and from a gear pump. They reported irregular meter output signals with pulsations at the drive frequency and large meter errors with pulsations at the Coriolis frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%