2017
DOI: 10.15621/ijphy/2017/v4i6/163926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Pulsed Magnetic Field on Peak Torque of Quadriceps/Hamstring Muscles and Knee Proprioception in Athletic Subjects:A Randomized Controlled Study

Abstract: Background: Many therapeutic uses for Pulsed magnetic fields have been extensively studied. Beneficial effects on the musculoskeletal system were established including bone healing, pain relief, and inflammatory conditions. The study aimed at investigating the possible effects of the pulsed magnetic field on quadriceps muscle torque, hamstring muscle torque and knee proprioception accuracy in athletic subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, although proprioception (JPS) improved in both groups at final assessment, there was no significant difference between the two groups. On contrary to our findings, no significant differences were obtained after application of MT in patients with MNP between magnetic and control groups, the findings of those authors confirmed existing significant differences between study and control groups [30,55]. The reason for this difference may be that the age of their patients sample within adult group while they are elderly in the current study, also they applied MT in addition other electrical modalities ultrasound and TENS, they referred the improvement in proprioception as additional effects for their application, whereas in the current study MT only was added to patients of magnetic group and the exercise program was applied for two groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, although proprioception (JPS) improved in both groups at final assessment, there was no significant difference between the two groups. On contrary to our findings, no significant differences were obtained after application of MT in patients with MNP between magnetic and control groups, the findings of those authors confirmed existing significant differences between study and control groups [30,55]. The reason for this difference may be that the age of their patients sample within adult group while they are elderly in the current study, also they applied MT in addition other electrical modalities ultrasound and TENS, they referred the improvement in proprioception as additional effects for their application, whereas in the current study MT only was added to patients of magnetic group and the exercise program was applied for two groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The reason for this difference may be that the age of their patients sample within adult group while they are elderly in the current study, also they applied MT in addition other electrical modalities ultrasound and TENS, they referred the improvement in proprioception as additional effects for their application, whereas in the current study MT only was added to patients of magnetic group and the exercise program was applied for two groups. Also, the author determined significant improvements in knee proprioception in 30 athletes aged 18-24 years [55]. The deviation away from the current findings may be due to the differences in the age of his patients' sample was (18-24 years), they are athletes, different pathology knee problem, whereas in the current study all participants were older than 60 years with chronic MNP and not athletes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%