2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2018.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of random surface orientation on W sputtering yields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some specific phenomena have been addressed by MD such as preferential sputtering in alloys [244]: it is found that the lighter and the weaker bound species are sputtered preferentially. Retention of the sputtering ion in the target has drawn attention, especially for the application in Helium sputtering of fusion wall materials [240, 242 and The sputtering of complex (porous) materials [244][245][246] is also of interest since bombarding a soft material is expected to modify sputtering rates and sputtered species energy and angle distribution.…”
Section: Simulations Of Sputteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some specific phenomena have been addressed by MD such as preferential sputtering in alloys [244]: it is found that the lighter and the weaker bound species are sputtered preferentially. Retention of the sputtering ion in the target has drawn attention, especially for the application in Helium sputtering of fusion wall materials [240, 242 and The sputtering of complex (porous) materials [244][245][246] is also of interest since bombarding a soft material is expected to modify sputtering rates and sputtered species energy and angle distribution.…”
Section: Simulations Of Sputteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ar ions with a kinetic energy of 60 eV were hitting the differently oriented surfaces perpendicularly. The ions were hitting a square box with the side length of 4 lattice constants, at 27 o C (300 K), similarly to previous studies on tungsten [18]. The interactions between Mo atoms were described by the Ackland et al potential [19], with the addition of Ziegler-Biersack-Littmark potential by Salonen et al [20].…”
Section: Modeling Of Crystal Lattice Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments and modeling were performed at ion energies close to the sputtering threshold of molybdenum. Under such conditions, the processes, usually dominating high-energy exposures, like ion channeling [18], are not playing a decisive role anymore. At the same time, the other processes involving e.g.…”
Section: Modeling Of Crystal Lattice Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, known that the surface orientation will dramatically affect the sputtering yields [14][15][16]. At low energies the surface atomic configuration and surface energy of different orientations will affect the sputtering yields [17,18], and at high energies the channeling effects of ions will lower the sputtering yield dramatically compared to directions that are non-channeling [19]. In order to investigate the effect of certain orientations, there have been some systematic studies on the effect of surface orientation dependent sputtering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%