2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Re on lattice trapping in γ′-Ni3Al cracks by atomistic simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such setup showed reliable results in previous studies. [4,13,29,34] To further confirm this setup reliability, we studied three different random distributions of Re atoms at 3 at.% doping level. The deviations of the lattice and elastic constants as well as surface energy and lattice trapping limits for these distributions were negligible, which confirms the reliability of the current random doping scheme chosen in this work.…”
Section: Computation Details 21 Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Such setup showed reliable results in previous studies. [4,13,29,34] To further confirm this setup reliability, we studied three different random distributions of Re atoms at 3 at.% doping level. The deviations of the lattice and elastic constants as well as surface energy and lattice trapping limits for these distributions were negligible, which confirms the reliability of the current random doping scheme chosen in this work.…”
Section: Computation Details 21 Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The EAM potentials typically provide reasonable results in describing the dislocations or/and crack systems of the Ni-based superalloys. [4,13,15,18,29,30,34] The 116107-2 MD simulations were performed by using the XMD program. [44] During the lattice trapping modeling, the cracks were firstly simulated under different loads, after which the atoms at the crack tips were fully relaxed by using the boundary condition described in Subsection 2.1.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations