2000
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7260.540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of receiving a heart transplant: analysis of a national cohort entered on to a waiting list, stratified by heart failure severity Commentary: Time for a controlled trial?

Abstract: Objective To determine whether there is a survival benefit associated with cardiac transplantation in Germany. Design Prospective observational cohort study. Setting All 889 adult patients listed for a first heart transplant in Germany in 1997. Main outcome measure Mortality, stratified by heart failure severity.Results Within 1 year after listing, patients with a predicted high risk had the highest global death rate (51% v 32% and 29% for medium and low risk patients respectively; P < 0.0001), had the highest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
3
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
69
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[682][683][684][685][686][687][688] The greatest survival benefit is seen in those patients who are at highest risk of death from advanced HF. 689 Cardiopulmonary exercise testing helps refine candidate selection. [690][691][692][693][694][695][696] Data suggest acceptable posttransplant outcomes in patients with reversible pulmonary hypertension, 697 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 698 peripartum cardiomyopathy, 699 restrictive cardiomyopathy, 700,701 and muscular dystrophy.…”
Section: Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[682][683][684][685][686][687][688] The greatest survival benefit is seen in those patients who are at highest risk of death from advanced HF. 689 Cardiopulmonary exercise testing helps refine candidate selection. [690][691][692][693][694][695][696] Data suggest acceptable posttransplant outcomes in patients with reversible pulmonary hypertension, 697 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 698 peripartum cardiomyopathy, 699 restrictive cardiomyopathy, 700,701 and muscular dystrophy.…”
Section: Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk stratification and subsequent outcome prediction as well as therapeutic recommendation-making needs to be based on the comparative survival benefit rationale [48,49]. Several clinical parameters have been associated with increased mortality in HF.…”
Section: Limitations Of Current Clinical Outcome Prediction Tools In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk stratification and subsequent outcome prediction, as well as therapeutic recommendation-making needs to be based on the comparative survival benefit rationale (33). Determining which patients with stage D HF would derive the most benefit from advanced therapies and recognizing the appropriate timing for administering these therapies before development of profound multi-OD, remains one of the most important aspects of care in this patient population.…”
Section: Clinical Risk Prediction and Comparative Survival Benefit Ratimentioning
confidence: 99%