ABSTRACT'. A model for predicting the relationship between protein and energy intakes of low-birth-weight (LBW) infants and the rate and composition of weight gain is described. It is based on linear multiple regression equations summarizing the rates of weight gain, nitrogen retention, and energy retention of 101 previously studied LBW infants fed protein intakes ranging from 2.25 to 3.9 g. kg-' .d-' and concomitant energy intakes ranging from 115 to 147 kcal. kg-'.d-' plus current theory concerning nutrient retention and body composition. To test the validity of the model, three combinations of protein and energy intake predicted by the model to result in specific rates and compositions of weight gain were fed to 44 LBW infants, and the observed rates of weight gain, protein accretion, and fat accretion were compared with the rates predicted by the model. Differences in these and other outcome variables between two of the groups, the intakes of which differed only in energy, also were compared to provide additional insight into the effect of concomitant energy intake on protein utilization. Across groups, actual outcomes correlated closely with predicted outcomes, supporting the validity of the model for the total population. However, outcomes of individual infants deviated as much as 30% from predicted outcomes; the magnitude of the deviation was independent of birth weight, gestational age, or size for gestational age. In addition, the mean rate of protein accretion of the group fed the highest protein/ energy ratio was significantly less than predicted. The higher mean urinary nitrogen excretion as well as blood urea nitrogen and plasma amino acid concentrations of this group versus the group that received a similar protein intake with a higher energy intake suggest that the higher energy intake improved nitrogen utilization. In toto, the data support the concept that the rate and composition of weight gain of LBW infants can be manipulated by intake; however, for individual infants, the extent of manipulation seems to be dependent on as-yet-unidentified inherent biologic variables. (Pediatr Res 35: [704][705][706][707][708][709][710][711][712] 1994) Abbreviations LBW, low birth weight Current guidelines for feeding LBW infants stress the importance of achieving as soon after birth as possible a rate of weight gain that is at least equal to or, preferably, greater than the intrauterine rate (1, 2). A number of studies have demonstrated that even the higher rates of weight gain can easily be achieved but that the accompanying rates of fat accretion are as much as 3-fold greater than the intrauterine rate (3-8). The desirability of such high rates of fat accretion are unknown. For most populations, they are considered undesirable, but this may not be true for the LBW infant who is born with limited fat stores. Moreover. approximately 40% of the weight gained by term infants over the first 4 mo of life appears to be fat (9), raising the possibility that high rates of fat accretion are unavoidable during ear...