1969
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(69)86803-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Recutting and Plant Maturity on Kernel Passage and Feeding Value of Corn Silage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decreased corn silage particle length increased DMI (Wilkinson et al, 1978;Weigand et al, 1993). Other studies have reported no effect on DMI when corn silage was re-cut or rolled (Buck et al, 1969;Miller et al, 1969;Rojas-Bourrillon et al, 1987).…”
Section: Intake and In Vivo Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Decreased corn silage particle length increased DMI (Wilkinson et al, 1978;Weigand et al, 1993). Other studies have reported no effect on DMI when corn silage was re-cut or rolled (Buck et al, 1969;Miller et al, 1969;Rojas-Bourrillon et al, 1987).…”
Section: Intake and In Vivo Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When fine chopped and rechopped silages were offered to dairy cows milk yield was little affected, but the rechopping process reduced milk fat content, which increased with time (Huber et al 1966;Miller et al 1969). Buck et al (1969) found no significant effect of the rechopping process on solids corrected milk yield or on milk fat content and suggested that this might have been due to the relatively short periods (5 weeks) used in their experiment. Little advantage would seem to be achieved by chopping whole crop maize shorter than 13 mm before ensiling and possibly a longer chop could be effectively employed.…”
Section: Maize Silagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in DM intake by dairy cows (Buck et al 1969;Miller et al 1969) and by heifers (Huber et al 1966) between chopped 6-13 mm) and rechopped maize (sufficient to break individual grains) before ensiling has also been found to be not significant, and in one comparison (Huber et al 1966) dairy cows ate significantly more (P < 0.05) field-chopped than rechopped maize silage.…”
Section: Maize Silagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A higher theoretical chop length would otherwise lead to a reduced starch and fibre digestibility (Cook and Bernard, 2005). The optimal chop length and shredding of maize to be ensiled and fed to dairy cows has been the subject of research already in the 1960s (Buck et al, 1969;Miller et al, 1969) and was reviewed by Johnson et al (1999), but only few studies dealt with the effects of this processed long-chopped maize silage. Vanderwerff et al (2015) showed a slightly increased milk yield when replacing conventional maize silage by this type of long-chopped maize silage in a diet with 400 g concentrate/kg diet DM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%