2002
DOI: 10.3354/meps239277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of reef framework and bottom sediment on nutrient enrichment in a coral reef of the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data are mean 6 SE, showing the number of values used in the calculations (n). See Table 2 focusing on specific habitats such as sediments (Capone et al 1992;Rasheed et al 2002;Al-Rousan et al 2004), coral cavities (Gast et al 1998;Scheffers et al 2004;Rasheed et al 2006), or micro atolls (Steven and Atkinson 2003), but the relevance of these habitat-specific rates at the scale of a reef community or ecosystem remains difficult to discern (Table 6). The release rates that were estimated in the present study, by assuming gross nutrient uptake was mass-transfer limited (J 2 MTL ), were on the same order as those documented in coral cavities and micro atolls, but were an order of magnitude higher than observed over carbonate sediments (generally a net sink; Wild et al 2005;Eyre et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data are mean 6 SE, showing the number of values used in the calculations (n). See Table 2 focusing on specific habitats such as sediments (Capone et al 1992;Rasheed et al 2002;Al-Rousan et al 2004), coral cavities (Gast et al 1998;Scheffers et al 2004;Rasheed et al 2006), or micro atolls (Steven and Atkinson 2003), but the relevance of these habitat-specific rates at the scale of a reef community or ecosystem remains difficult to discern (Table 6). The release rates that were estimated in the present study, by assuming gross nutrient uptake was mass-transfer limited (J 2 MTL ), were on the same order as those documented in coral cavities and micro atolls, but were an order of magnitude higher than observed over carbonate sediments (generally a net sink; Wild et al 2005;Eyre et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…yr -1 ) and the total surface area covered over the same time period at different population densities. The resulting sediment volumes were subsequently multiplied by 0.5 to account for the notion that approximately 50% of the coral reef habitat consists of sand; remaining habitats typically comprise hard, non-bioturbatable substrates, including live coral and coral rubble (as described by Rasheed et al 2002).To complement the data on the volume of sediment bioturbated, the total surface area of sediment in contact with the ventral foot of Holothuria whitmaei was also determined. This was calculated by multiplying the average daily rate of activity (cm d -1 ) by the average breadth of the sea cucumber's ventral surface (11.92 cm, based on n = 30 haphazard measurements) (following Uthicke 2001a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data presented in Table 5 (Table 5). Multiplication of the total distance travelled by the diameter of the trivium yielded an estimate of the sediment area in contact with the base of the sea cucumber ( ), the total area of sediment contacted was estimated conservatively as approximately 2 times the total available coral reef sediment per hectare per annum (based on the assumption that sediment accounts for ~50% of the coral reef habitat area as described by Rasheed et al 2002). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason that the end-member of the upstream concentration varies is unclear; however, this variation is probably caused by day-to-day variation in the fl ow rate. Regarding the variation in the Cd concentration at the bay site (St. P), as Abe (2007) reported, the remineralization and release of Cd associated with organic matter from sediments (Gobeil et al 1987;Rasheed et al 2002) and atmospheric deposition from the land (Duce et al 1980;Arimoto et al 1985) could be anticipated in this study period as well. The variation in the Cd concentrations of upstream and bay water and the characteristic and amount of supplied Cd-adsorbed particles into the study sites might be infl uenced by weather conditions, such as precipitation and wind stress, which probably change each distribution pattern in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%