1974
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740250411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of refining on the nutritional value of rapeseed oils for the chick and rat

Abstract: Experiments were conducted to examine the effect of refining upon the energy utilisation from higherucicacid rapeseed oil, low erucic acid rapeseed oil, maize oil, soya bean oil and herring oil.When fed to chicks and rats, refined high erucic acid rapeseed oils were markedly lower in m.e. and d.e. content and gave poorer growth and feed efficiency than the corresponding crude oils. Removal of the gums present in the crude oils was partially responsible for the reduction in the available energy of the oils. Alk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

1977
1977
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are somewhat contradictory to the previous reports that increased saturated fatty acid content of dietary rapeseed oil overcame the growth-depressing action of EA (Beare et al, 1963;Lall and Slinger, 1974;Salmon, 1969). Regardless of the source of oil fed, the apparent digestibility of total fatty acids was significantly (P<.05) reduced in the following order of 14.4, 12.8, and 5.7% for AL plus EA, CBO plus EA, and SFO plus EA, respectively, compared with the control (oil treatment without EA).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are somewhat contradictory to the previous reports that increased saturated fatty acid content of dietary rapeseed oil overcame the growth-depressing action of EA (Beare et al, 1963;Lall and Slinger, 1974;Salmon, 1969). Regardless of the source of oil fed, the apparent digestibility of total fatty acids was significantly (P<.05) reduced in the following order of 14.4, 12.8, and 5.7% for AL plus EA, CBO plus EA, and SFO plus EA, respectively, compared with the control (oil treatment without EA).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…This was further confirmed with a chick study using rapeseed oil blended with a low level of saturated beef tallow in which the growth-depression was completely eliminated (Salmon, 1969). Furthermore, a synergism was suggested by chick studies when rapeseed oil was blended with a low level of animal tallow (Lall and Slinger, 1974). These findings imply that the growth-depressing effect of dietary EA may be a result of metabolic interaction(s) among fatty acids and that specific fatty acid profiles may nullify the detrimental effect of dietary EA.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The possibility of adverse effects from this practice was also investigated with gums derived from both Tower oil and from Brassica napus (cv Midas) oil. Rapeseed gums are reported to be wellutilized by growing birds without adverse effect (Lall and Slinger, 1974;March, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oro), we have observed deleterious effects on turkey poult performance when using such gums (Slinger, unpublished observation). These effects have preponderated any favorable increase in energy level due to synergism obtained with mixtures of rapeseed oil and gums(Lall and Slinger 1974). With gums derived from Tower rapeseed, therefore, addition to fats or oils provide alternative and potentially more advantageous methods of disposal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%