2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of relative orientation of anisotropy planes to tunnel axis on the magnitude of tunnelling displacements

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWhen analysing the measured displacements at the Trojane tunnel (Slovenia), excavated in soft foliated rock mass, some interesting deformation patterns were observed, especially large surface settlements that appeared despite quick ring closure, stiff lining and consequently small tunnel lining displacement. It soon became clear that most of these phenomena are the consequences of highly anisotropic nature of the soft foliated rock mass. A vast number of numerical analyses were performed, varyin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…">IntroductionUnder natural conditions, the soil commonly exists in a normally consolidated state. However, with construction activities, such as excavation of foundation pits [13,41, 56], tunnel excavation [25, 48,51], embankment slope lling [9,20,24], the soil undergoes loading and unloading, changes in horizontal and vertical stresses, which cause the consolidation state to transition from the original isotropic consolidation to anisotropic consolidation. Many studies have emphasized the necessity of considering the anisotropy of the soil when designing and analyzing geological structures [9,20,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…">IntroductionUnder natural conditions, the soil commonly exists in a normally consolidated state. However, with construction activities, such as excavation of foundation pits [13,41, 56], tunnel excavation [25, 48,51], embankment slope lling [9,20,24], the soil undergoes loading and unloading, changes in horizontal and vertical stresses, which cause the consolidation state to transition from the original isotropic consolidation to anisotropic consolidation. Many studies have emphasized the necessity of considering the anisotropy of the soil when designing and analyzing geological structures [9,20,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12.4b). Klopčič and Logar (2014) obtained similar results and therefore concluded that tunnel advance with the dip is advantageous because in this case the major part of the displacements occurs ahead of the face and, consequently, the convergences are smaller. This conclusion is correct concerning the crown displacement, but disregards that the convergence at the invert, which under squeezing conditions is equally important, will be considerably bigger.…”
Section: Influence Of the Dip Angle On The Pre-deformationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…They found out that the existing expressions (valid for isotropic rock masses under a uniform state of stress) are applicable only if the plane of transverse isotropy strikes parallel to the tunnel axis; otherwise three-dimensional analyses are necessary. Klopčič and Logar (2014) and Madkour (2012) showed that a large portion of displacements occurs ahead of the tunnel face especially when tunnelling with the dip, but did not consider failure of the rock matrix. Schubert and Mendez (2017) also investigated the influence of the orientation of the schistosity on the tunnel behaviour using the example of the Galgenberg Tunnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simona (2014) analyzed the influence factors regarding the opening stability, including the support stiffness, rock damage and tunnel depth, and proposed an analytical approach based on the determination and integration of the rock-lining interface differential equation. Jure and Janko (2014) simulated the effect of overburden and the orientation of anisotropy plane on tunnel deformation and compared their results to the measurements at the Trojane tunnel (Slovenia). Zhao et al (2018) discussed the strengthening and isolation strategies to reduce seismic damage to tunnels and thought that the isolation layer is better to collaborate with the strengthening layer and a relatively large modulus and small thickness should be chosen for the isolation layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%