1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61848-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Renal-Artery Stenting on Progression of Renovascular Renal Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvement or stabilisation of renal function has been variable, with different groups reporting response values of 50–70% 121-124. A prospective study of PTRA plus stenting, although demonstrating improvement or stabilisation of renal function in 69% of patients, also reported a one-year mortality rate of 40% 125. Observations such as this reinforce the need for careful patient selection.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Improvement or stabilisation of renal function has been variable, with different groups reporting response values of 50–70% 121-124. A prospective study of PTRA plus stenting, although demonstrating improvement or stabilisation of renal function in 69% of patients, also reported a one-year mortality rate of 40% 125. Observations such as this reinforce the need for careful patient selection.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It was also shown here that both the systolic and diastolic BPs were significantly reduced after PTRAS. Similarly, stenting in ARAS has been significantly associated with decreased BP in other studies [15,[17][18][19]24,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…PTRAS is not only a less invasive procedure but is also associated with fewer complications and lower procedure-related mortality rates [16,17]. However, the effects of renal stenting on blood pressure (BP) control and the improvement or even maintenance of renal function are still a subject of debate [18,19]. Factors predicting a beneficial outcome also remain controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several weaknesses have been identified with these trials including the small number of patients, cross over, selection bias, and potential of under powering of the trials [8, 12, 13]. Observational studies and results of registries suggest that technically successful revascularization confers a substantial survival benefit to some "high risk" patient subsets [5, 6, 1420]. Because this population often includes older subjects with the presence of extensive comorbid cardiovascular disease, identifying predictors for all-cause mortality and/or progression to renal replacement therapy (RRT with hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or kidney transplantation) is an important goal in planning therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%