2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Physical Function and Motor Signs in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
62
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
5
62
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our subgroup analysis showed the effect size was statistically significant for trials of multiple sessions with higher number of total stimulation pulses (range from 18,000 to 20,000 pulses). This is in line with an earlier review that indicates a larger effect size of rTMS on UPDRS‐III scores is associated with a greater number of stimulation pulses (Chung & Mak, ). One study of rTMS on major depression showed that 1,200–1,500 pulses/day for 10 or 20 sessions (a total of dose between 12,000 and 30,000 pulses) had the best anxiolytic effects (Teng et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our subgroup analysis showed the effect size was statistically significant for trials of multiple sessions with higher number of total stimulation pulses (range from 18,000 to 20,000 pulses). This is in line with an earlier review that indicates a larger effect size of rTMS on UPDRS‐III scores is associated with a greater number of stimulation pulses (Chung & Mak, ). One study of rTMS on major depression showed that 1,200–1,500 pulses/day for 10 or 20 sessions (a total of dose between 12,000 and 30,000 pulses) had the best anxiolytic effects (Teng et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, rTMS over the M1 is more effective than stimulation over the SMA. A previous study gained the similar result (Chung & Mak, ). Moreover, Zanjani et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, it is necessary to identify the use of LP in the PD's treatment and to determine the pharmacoeconomic studies' quality that has been done in the last five years. In the literature exists multiple systematic reviews of Parkinson's disease and others associated with the disease treatment [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. But, there are not quality evaluations of the publication's methodology focused on cost-utility studies of the LD used in the EP treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%